期刊文献+

“一带一路”沿线跨境并购的特征、影响因素及展望——基于美、英、日、中的国际比较 被引量:3

Characteristic,Determinants Factors and Future Prospects of Corss-border Mergers and Acquisitions in the “Belt and Road” Area Based on the International Comparison of the United States,the United Kingdom,Japan and China
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用Thomson Reuters SDC Platinum database数据库,对2000-2016年间以"一带一路"沿线地区为目的地的跨境并购的主要特征进行分析,对比美、英、日、中四国的并购偏好特征,并对背后的影响因素进行解释,主要结论如下:(1)并购来源国以域外、高收入国家为主,但随着全球金融危机的发生和"一带一路"倡议的提出,来自发展中国家的并购增长显著;(2)美国的跨境并购集中在西亚和南亚,具有技术、知识密集特点;英国以南亚为主要目标,集中在能源、电信服务等行业;日本集中在东盟地区,以金融、能源、工业为主;中国是中亚地区最大的投资国,以能源行业为主,近年来有向服务业、高新技术行业多样化发展的趋势;(3)不同国家的并购差异既受并购国不同优势的驱动,也受目标国经济、制度、地理等因素的影响。随着经济发展,并购规模和地位也会发生动态演变。 Mainly based on Thomson Reuters SDC Platinum database, this paper analyzes the main facts and characteristics of cross-border mergers and acquisitions(CBM A) from 2000 to 2016 in the 'Belt and Road' area,and four countries’ investment preference. The mainly findings are as follows.(1) After financial crisis in 2008 and the proposal of the 'Belt and Road Initiative',the CBM A share of emerging market and developing economies are on the rise, and the competition of investors is becoming more diversified.(2) The CBM A of US mainly invests in West Asia and South Asia,with technology and knowledge intensive features;UK concentrates in South Asia and in energy, telecommunications sectors;while, Japan ’ s CBM A concentrates in the ASEAN countries, and in finance, energy and industry sectors;China is the largest investor of central Asia. Although China mainly invests in energy sector, there is a new trend of diversification especially in service and high-tech sectors.(3) CBM A differences among different countries are not only driven by acquiring countries’ advantages, but also affected by various factors, like economy,institution,culture,geography and so on, of target countries.
作者 王喆 王碧珺 张明 Wang Zhe;Wang Bi-jun;Zhang Ming
出处 《亚太经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期98-109,156,共13页 Asia-Pacific Economic Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1涂万春,陈奉先.中国对外直接投资阶段的实证分析[J].重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛),2006,16(1):54-56. 被引量:13
  • 2姚永华,苏佳丽,陈飞翔.我国对外投资发展阶段的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2006(10):96-101. 被引量:19
  • 3李辉.经济增长与对外投资大国地位的形成[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):38-47. 被引量:74
  • 4薛求知,朱吉庆.中国对外直接投资发展阶段的实证研究[J].世界经济研究,2007(2):36-40. 被引量:40
  • 5郑亚莉,杨益均.浙江对外直接投资发展阶段的实证研究与趋势分析[J].浙江社会科学,2007(5):32-37. 被引量:7
  • 6Alvaro Calderon, Michael Mortimore, Wilson Peres. Mexico: Foreign Investment as a Source of International Competitiveness [C]. in John H. Dunning, Rajneesh Narula, eds. Foreign Direct Investment and Governments: Catalysts for Economic Restructuring, London and New York: Routledge, 1996: 240-79.
  • 7Christian Bellak. The Austrian investment development path [J]. Transnational Corporations, 2001, 10(2): 107-34.
  • 8Fabienne Boudier-Bensebaa. FDI-assisted Development in the Light of the Investment Development Path Paradigm: Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries[J]. Transnational Corporations, 2008, 17 (1) : 37-63.
  • 9Frank Barry, HolgerGorg, Andrew McDowell. Outward FDI and the Investment Development Path of a late-industrializing Economy: Evidence from Ireland [J]. Regional Studies, 2003, 37 (,4) : 341-49.
  • 10Hai-Yan Zhang, Danny Van Den Bulcke. China: Rapid Changes in the Investment Development Path [C]. in John H. Dunning, Rajneesh Narula, eds. Foreign Direct Investment and Governments: Catalysts for Economic Restructuring. London and New York: Routledge, 1996: 390-418.

共引文献128

同被引文献22

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部