期刊文献+

无保护会阴接生技术的临床应用观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of unprotected perineum delivery technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无保护会阴接生技术的临床效果。方法正常阴道分娩产妇300例,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组150例,研究组采用新的无保护会阴接生技术进行接生,对照组采用旧的常规保护会阴法进行接生。结果研究组150例产妇正常阴道分娩,会阴侧切16例,会阴Ⅱ度裂伤50例,会阴Ⅰ度裂伤60例,会阴完整24例,新生儿窒息0例;对照组150例产妇正常阴道分娩,会阴侧切31例,会阴Ⅱ度裂伤84例,会阴Ⅰ度裂伤27例,会阴完整8例,新生儿窒息0例。结论无保护会阴接生技术在降低会阴侧切率、会阴Ⅱ度裂伤率,提高会阴完整率方面明显优于常规保护会阴法接生。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of unprotected perineum delivery technology.Methods Normal vaginal delivery in 300 cases Were randomly divided into two groups,study group and control group,each group of 150 cases, The control group uses the conventional protection of perineum method. The study group using new unprotected perineum delivery technology. Results The study group of 150 cases of maternal vaginal delivery, Perineal resection in 16 cases,50 cases of perineal laceration degree II,60 cases of perineallaceration of perineum type,complete in 24 cases,neonatal asphyxia 0 cases. The control group of 150 cases of maternal vaginal delivery, Perineal resection in 31 cases,the second degree perineal laceration in 84 cases,27 cases ofperineal laceration of perineum type,complete in 8 cases,neonatal asphyxia 0 cases. Conclusion Unprotected perineum delivery technology,to reduce the rate of lateral episiotomy and perineal laceration of perineum II rate,improve the first degree laceration rate and integrity rate,is superior to the traditional protection of perineum method.
作者 李迎春
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2015年第S1期2-3,共2页 The Medical Forum
关键词 分娩 无保护会阴接生 会阴侧切 会阴裂伤 Delivery technology Protection of perineum The lateral episiotomy Perineal laceration
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1ChrisKette,李金科,许良智.分娩期会阴保护的证据[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(6):489-494. 被引量:16
  • 2梁晓红.分娩时保护会阴的方法及要点[J].中国民康医学,2007,19(20):894-894. 被引量:2
  • 3Sherry Boschert. Hands off tile perineum during delivery? [J] . Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2010, 65 (2) : 71.
  • 4周岚.预防会阴切口感染的操作和护理[J]中华医学实践杂志,2004(03):370.
  • 5刘胜文.现代医院感染管理手册[M]北京:北京医科大学出版社,200272.
  • 6Manzanares S,Cobo D, Moreno-Martinez MD,et al. Risk of episiotomy and perineal lacerations recurring after first deliv- ery[J]. Birth,2013,40(4) :307-311.
  • 7Seijmonsbergen-Scherrners AE, Geerts CC, Prins M, et al. Theuse of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis[J]. Birth,2013,40(4):247-255.
  • 8R/iisinen S, Cartwright R, Gissler M, et al. Changing associa- tions of episiotomy and anal sphincter injury across risk stra- ta: results of a population-based register study in Finland 2004-2011[J]. BMJ Open,2013,3(8) :e003216.
  • 9Luterek K,Barcz E,Bablok L,et al. Giant recurrent perineal endometriosis in an episiotomy scar-a case report[J]. Ginekol Pol,2013,84(8) :726-729.
  • 10Karacam Z, Ekmen H, Cali:ir H, et al. Prevalence of episioto- my in primiparas, related conditions, and effects of episioto- my on suture materials used, perineal pain, wound healing 3 weeks postpartum, in turkey: a prospective follow-up study [J]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res,2013,18(3) :237-245.

共引文献53

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部