摘要
目的探讨无保护会阴接生技术的临床效果。方法正常阴道分娩产妇300例,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组150例,研究组采用新的无保护会阴接生技术进行接生,对照组采用旧的常规保护会阴法进行接生。结果研究组150例产妇正常阴道分娩,会阴侧切16例,会阴Ⅱ度裂伤50例,会阴Ⅰ度裂伤60例,会阴完整24例,新生儿窒息0例;对照组150例产妇正常阴道分娩,会阴侧切31例,会阴Ⅱ度裂伤84例,会阴Ⅰ度裂伤27例,会阴完整8例,新生儿窒息0例。结论无保护会阴接生技术在降低会阴侧切率、会阴Ⅱ度裂伤率,提高会阴完整率方面明显优于常规保护会阴法接生。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of unprotected perineum delivery technology.Methods Normal vaginal delivery in 300 cases Were randomly divided into two groups,study group and control group,each group of 150 cases, The control group uses the conventional protection of perineum method. The study group using new unprotected perineum delivery technology. Results The study group of 150 cases of maternal vaginal delivery, Perineal resection in 16 cases,50 cases of perineal laceration degree II,60 cases of perineallaceration of perineum type,complete in 24 cases,neonatal asphyxia 0 cases. The control group of 150 cases of maternal vaginal delivery, Perineal resection in 31 cases,the second degree perineal laceration in 84 cases,27 cases ofperineal laceration of perineum type,complete in 8 cases,neonatal asphyxia 0 cases. Conclusion Unprotected perineum delivery technology,to reduce the rate of lateral episiotomy and perineal laceration of perineum II rate,improve the first degree laceration rate and integrity rate,is superior to the traditional protection of perineum method.
出处
《基层医学论坛》
2015年第S1期2-3,共2页
The Medical Forum
关键词
分娩
无保护会阴接生
会阴侧切
会阴裂伤
Delivery technology
Protection of perineum
The lateral episiotomy
Perineal laceration