期刊文献+

护理风险管理应用于急诊危重消化道出血患者院内转运中的价值分析 被引量:6

Analysis of the Value of Nursing Risk Management in Hospital Transportation of Patients with Critical Gastrointestinal Bleeding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析护理风险管理在危重消化道出血患者急诊治疗中院内转运的价值。方法选取我院2016年12月~2017年12月急诊处理的危重消化道出血患者36例,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组18例。对照组采用传统急诊护理措施,实验组在对照组基础上加用护理风险管理护理措施。对比两组抢救物品完好率、导管操作无菌情况合格率、护理满意度和院内转运时间。结果实验组抢救物品完好率和导管操作无菌情况合格率分别为94.44%和100.00%,均高于对照组的83.33%和88.89%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组护理满意度为100.00%,高于对照组的94.44%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者院内转运时间均十分迅速,实验组院内转运时间为(1.01±0.17)min,对照组为(1.18±0.21)min,组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论护理风险管理对急诊危重消化道出血院内转运价值较高,可提高抢救物品完好率和导管操作无菌情况合格率,提高护理满意度。 Objective To analyze the value of nursing risk management in the hospital for emergency treatment of patients with critical gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods 36 patients with critical gastrointestinal hemorrhage who were treated urgently from December 2016 to December 2017 in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 18 cases in each group. The control group used traditional emergency nursing measures, and the experimental group added nursing risk management nursing measures based on the control group. Compare the two groups of rescue items in good condition, catheter operation aseptic condition pass rate, care satisfaction and in-hospital transit time. Results The pass rate of the rescued items in the experimental group and the aseptic condition of the catheter operation were 94.44% and 100.00%, respectively, which were higher than the control group’s 83.33% and 88.89%,the difference was statistically significant( P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was 100.00%, which was higher than that of the control group 94.44%,the difference was statistically significant( P<0.05). The intra-transitence time of the two groups was very rapid. The intra-transitory time of the experimental group was(1.01 ±0.17) min, and the control group was(1.18±0.21) min. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Nursing risk management has a higher value for in-hospital transport of critically ill digestive tract hemorrhage, which can improve the insufficiency rate of rescue articles and the sterility of catheter operation and improve the satisfaction of nursing.
作者 张琪 简海英 ZHANG Qi;JIAN Hai-ying(Pediatrics,Shangao County Chinese Medicine Hospital,Shanggao 336400,Jiangxi,China;Emergency Department,Shangao County Chinese Medicine Hospital,Shanggao 336400,Jiangxi,China)
出处 《医学信息》 2019年第4期191-192,共2页 Journal of Medical Information
关键词 护理风险管理 危重消化道出血 急诊 院内转运 Nursing risk management Critical gastrointestinal bleeding Emergency department In-hospital transport
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1席淑华,王雅芳,周立,严爱萍,朱国琴.对急诊护理操作实施风险管理的探讨[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(2):120-122. 被引量:160
  • 2Simp son R L. Patient and Nurse Safety: How Information Technology Makes a Difference[J]. Nurse Admin Q, 2005,29 (1) :97-101.
  • 3中国医院协会编.2008患者安全目标[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2008:8-9.
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.急诊患者病情分级指导原则(征求意见稿)[J].中华危重症医学杂志:电子版,2011,4(4):241-243.
  • 5Ashley I,Armitage G. Failure mode and effects analysis an empirical comparison of failure mode scoring proce dures[J]. J Pat Saf,2010,6(4) :210-215.
  • 6Estorillo C, Posso RK. The reduction of irregularities in the use of "process FMEA"[J]. Int J Qual Rel Manag, 2010,27 (6) :721-733.
  • 7International Standards Organization. ISO/TS22367:2008 Medical laboratories reduction of error through risk man- agement and continual improvement [S]. Geneva, Swiss: ISO,2010.
  • 8任国英,方云,周玲.护患沟通管理流程在门诊输液中心的应用[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2008,23(8):51-52. 被引量:45
  • 9魏莹,江淑聘,厉晓洁.急诊危重患者院内安全转运探讨[J].临床医学工程,2008,15(12):55-56. 被引量:12
  • 10张文娴,崔妙玲.在护理工作中影响患者安全的六大因素分析及对策[J].护士进修杂志,2009,24(6):560-562. 被引量:38

共引文献306

同被引文献24

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部