2Yitschaky O,Redlich M,Abed,et al. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images [J]. Angle Orthod, 2011, 81 (1) : 13-18.
3Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, et al. Comparison between tradi- tional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004, 126 (5) : 397-409.
4Scarfe WC,Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental practice [J]. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 2006, 72 (1) : 75-80.
5Harrel WE, Hatcher DC, Bolt RL. In search of anatomic truth:3-di- mensional modeling and the future of orthodontics [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 122 (3) : 325-330.
6Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone beam computed tomography [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(2) : 257-265.
7Van Vlijmen OJ,Berge SJ,Swennen GR,et al. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed to- mography scans and conventional radiographs [J]. Int J Oral Maxil- lofac Surg, 2009, 67 (1) : 92-97.
8Ludlow JB,Gubler M,Cevidanes L, et al. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification:cone-beam computed tomography vs con- ventional cephalometric views[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009,136(3) : 312-313.
9Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Hwang M S, et al. Effect of head rotation on late- ral cephalometric radiographs [J]. Angle Orthod, 2001,71 (5) : 396- 403.
