不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的效果分析

Analysis of the effects of different blood collection methods for blood tests in clinical application

目的:分析不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的效果。方法:将2017年8月至2018年1月作为本次研究时间段,在该时间段内总共选取120例受检者作为本次研究案例。所有患者均在检验前一天晚禁食,在清晨8时空腹状态下对患者实行采血。所有患者分别应用手指末梢血、肘前静脉血、桡动脉血。统计并对比三种方式在重复性检测方面的结果以及八项参数的均值。结果:血常规检验结果中八项参数通过统计分析计算之后,动脉血和静脉血相比,结果无明显差异,数据未达到统计学差异标准(P>0.05)。结论:不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的差异突出,末梢血在临床当中的稳定性显著低于静脉血与动脉血,静脉采血方式在血常规检验当中具备较为突出的临床价值,可以作为临床中血常规常用检验方式,值得推广普及。

Objective To analyze the effect of blood routine examination in clinical application of different blood sampling methods. Methods From August 2017 to January 2018, 120 subjects were selected as the cases in this study period. All patients were fasting the night before, and blood was collected at 8 a.m. fasting. All patients were treated with peripheral blood, venous blood and radial artery. The results of the repeatability test and the mean of the eight parameters were compared. Results Eight parameters in routine blood test results through statistical analysis and calculation, after compared arterial blood and venous blood, no difference between the results, the data did not reach the standard statistical difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Different blood sampling method in routine blood test in the clinical application of differences is outstanding, the stability of peripheral blood in clinical significantly lower than that of venous and arterial blood, venous sampling methods in routine blood test have more prominent clinical value, can be used as a routine blood test commonly used in clinical, and worthy of popularization.