期刊文献+

膝关节骨挫伤的MR诊断价值与应用分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨针对膝关节骨挫伤患者采用MR诊断的应用价值。方法:选择2017年3月至2018年8月期间本院收治的60例膝关节骨挫伤患者作为研究资料,均行MRI检查诊断,分析膝关节骨挫伤的MR影响表现,判断其诊断价值。结果:60例患者发现骨挫伤病灶71处,其中股骨近段40处,股骨远段14处,腓骨近段7处,髌骨10处;另合并关节囊积液发生率50.70%,合并半月板损伤发生率16.70%,合并前交叉韧带损伤发生率5.63%,合并内、外侧副韧带损伤发生率8.45%,合并股四头肌腱损伤发生率5.63%,合并膝关节周围软组织损伤发生率73.24%。MR诊断中,常规T1加权显示95.77%,T2加权显示91.55%,压脂序列显示100.0%。结论:针对膝关节骨挫伤患者采用MR诊断方式具有较高的应用价值,能够发现骨挫伤病灶的位置,为判断病情提供可靠依据,制定正确有效的治疗方案,值得推广。
作者 徐培红
出处 《影像研究与医学应用》 2019年第5期162-163,共2页 Journal of Imaging Research and Medical Applications
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献45

  • 1John FQ, Sandra We, Karl Mc, et al. Isohted pophteus rapture at the muscttlar-tendinottsjuncfion [J]..J Knee Sttrg, 2011 ( 24 ) : 137-140.
  • 2Dieppe PA, Lohmander LS. Pathogenesls and managenmnt of pain in osteoarthritis[ J ]. Lancet, 2005,365 (9463) : 965-973. DOI: ht- tp ://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/S0140-6736(05 )71086-2.
  • 3Choi JA, Gold GE. MR Imaging of articular cartilage physiology [J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2011,19(2) :249-282. DOI: 10. 1016/j. mrie. 2011.02. 010.
  • 4Regatte RR, Akella SV, Reddy R. Depth - dependent proton mag- netization transfer in articular cartilage [ J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2005,22(2) : 318- 323. DOI: 10. 1002/jmri. 20377.
  • 5White LM, Sussman MS, Hurtig M, et al. Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparatiye tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects [ J ]. Radiology, 2006,241 ( 2 ) :407- 414. DO1 : http ://dx. doi. org/10.1148/radiol. 2412051750.
  • 6Sandro Kohl, Simon Meier, Sufian S, et al. Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3T 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions : comparison with knee arthroscopy [ J ]. Orthopae- dic Surgery and Research,2015, l0 ( 1 ) : 191. DOI: 10. 1186/ s13018-015-0326-1.
  • 7Chen BL, Roeder E, Vuissoz PA, et al. Respective interest of T2 mapping and diffusion tensor imaging in assessing porcine knee carti- lage with MR at 3 Teslas [ J ]. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineer- ing,2013,23(4) :263-272. DOI: 10. 3233/BME-130750.
  • 8Joseph GB, Baum T, Alizai H, et al. Baseline mean and heteroge- neity of MR cartilage T2 are associated with morphologic degenera- tion ofcartilage, meniscus and bone marrow over 3 years-data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative [ J ]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2012, 20 (7) :727-735. DOI: http://dx, doi. org/10. 1016/j. joca. 2012.04. 003.
  • 9Baum T, Stehling C, Joseph GB, et al. Changes in knee cartilage T2 values over 24 months in subjects with and without risk factors tot knee osteoarthritis and their association with focal knee lesions at baseline: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative[ J]. Magn Reson Im- aging, 2012,35 (2) :370-378. DOI : 10. 1002/jmri. 22834.
  • 10Hovis KK, Stehling C, Souza RB, et al. Physical activity is associ- ated with MR-based knee cartilage T2 measurements in asymptomatic subjects with and without osteoarthritis risk factors [ J ]. Arthritis Rhemn,2011,63 ( 8 ) :2248-2256. DOI : 10. 1002/art. 30419.

共引文献31

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部