期刊文献+

冠状动脉造影联合血流储备分数在冠心病患者冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的冠状动脉造影(CAG)是评价冠状动脉狭窄的金标准,但是无法准确地判断冠状动脉狭窄与心肌缺血的关系,本研究探讨CAG联合血流储备分数(FFR)在冠心病患者冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用效果。方法选取进行冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者1 000例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,每组500例。观察组在行冠状动脉介入治疗前使用CAG联合FFR,对照组行冠状动脉介入治疗前使用CAG,对比两组手术后支架植入数量、住院费用及心脏不良事件的发生情况。结果观察组支架植入数量与住院费用分别为(1.04±0.45)个,(4.75±2.30)万元,对照组分别为(1.85±0.56)个,(5.12±2.24)万元,两组对比差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。手术后6个月,观察组发生再次血运重建7例、再发心肌梗死8例、心绞痛29例,对照组分别为22、45、35例,两组心绞痛发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组再次血运重建及再发心肌梗死的比例低于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论在冠心病介入治疗中应用CAG联合FFR能够减少冠心病患者支架的使用数量及医疗费用,并降低心脏不良事件的发生率。
作者 麻新国
出处 《慢性病学杂志》 2018年第3期302-303,306,共3页 Chronic Pathematology Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1韩雅玲.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(12):50-59. 被引量:133
  • 2Pils NH, De Brunye B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reverse to assess the fractional severity of coronary artery stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334(26):1703-1708.
  • 3Dias CC,Mateus P,Bettencourt N,et al. Value of frational flow reserve in the management of patients with moderate coronary stenosis [J]. Rev Port Cardil, 2004, 23 (14): 1409-1416.
  • 4Pijls NH, van Son JA,Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for asses- sing functional stenosis severity before and after percuta- neous transuminal coronary angioplaty [J]. Circulation, 1993,87(4) :1354-1367.
  • 5Caymaz O, Fak AS, Tezcan H, et al. Correlation of myo- cardial fractional flow reserve with thallium-201 spect im- aging in intermediate-severity coronary artery lesions[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2000,12 (12) : 345-350.
  • 6Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,et al. Fractional Flow reserveversus angiography for guiding percutaneous coro- nary intervention[J 1. N Engl J Med, 2009,360 ( 3 ) : 213- 224.
  • 7Fearon MM, Bornschenein B,Tonino PA, et al. Economi- cal evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutane- ous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel dis- ease[J]. Circulation, 2010,122 (14) : 2545-2550.
  • 8Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional serversity of coronary artery stenosis in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiogra- phy in multivessel evlauationFJ. J Am Coll Cariol, 2010, 55(25) : 2813-2821.
  • 9Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant steno- sis 5 years follow-up of the DEFER study[J]. J Am Coil Cariol,2007,49(21) :2105-2111.
  • 10Koo BK, Waseda K, Kang H J, et al. Anatomic and func- tional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percun- taneous coronary intervation[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2010,3(2) : 113-119.

共引文献87

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部