期刊文献+

神经刺激与异感两种定位方法对腋路臂丛多点阻滞效果的比较 被引量:2

Multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block: A comparison of two methods of nerve localization nerve stimulation versus paresthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较异感定位或神经刺激定位对腋路臂丛多点注射阻滞的起效时间、成功率以及并发症 .方法 :以神经刺激定位法 (PNS)或诱发异感法 (PAR)定位臂丛神经主支 ,于各点分别注入 8mL 2 0g·L-1利多卡因和 7.5g·L-1布比卡因合剂 ,观察和记录阻滞操作时间 ,阻滞起效时间 ,可行手术时间及总的麻醉时间 .结果 :PNS组各项时间均明显短于PAR组 .PNS组的完全阻滞发生率较PAR组高 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,这与其桡神经与肌皮神经的阻滞成功率高相关 (P <0 .0 5 ) .PAR组的静脉误伤率较高 (P <0 .0 5 ) .结论 :PNS较PAR成功率更高 ,阻滞出现更快 。 AIM: To compare the onset time and the success rate of a multiple point injection for axillary brachial plexus block performed by using two methods of nerve localization: paresthesia elicitation or nerve stimulation. METHODS: Each of the major nerves of the plexus was located by elicitation of a paresthesia (Group PAR; n = 48) or by nerve stimulation (Group PNS; n =48) and injected with 8 mL of local anesthetic solution. Time of blocking, onset, beginning of surgery and total anesthetic period was recorded respectively. RESULTS: The time recorded in Group PNS was significantly shorter than that in Group PAR (91% vs 76%; P <0.05) and the success rate for anesthetizing the radial and the musculocutaneous nerves in Group PNS was higher in Group PNS ( P <0.05). The rate of venous puncture was higher in Group PAR ( P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation is a better than paresthesia elicitation for axillary brachial plexus block.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2003年第7期665-667,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词 腋路臂丛神经阻滞 神经刺激仪 利多卡因 布比卡因 nerve stimulator brachial plexus block lidocaine bupivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Hill DA, Campbell WI. Two approaches to the axillary brachial plexus: loss of resistance to saline or paraesthesia[J]? Anaesthesia, 1992;47:207-209.
  • 2[2]Koscielniak-Nilsen ZJ, Stens-Pedersen Hl, Knudsen Lippert F. Readiness for surgery after axillary block: Single or multiple injection techniques [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 1997;14;164-171.
  • 3[3]Herman C. Comparison of transarterial and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for axillary block using a high dose of mepivacaine with adrenaline [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1999;43:398-404.
  • 4[4]Koscielniak-Nielsen Zj, Hesselbjerg L, Fejlberg V. Comparison of transarteria and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for aninitial axillary block by 45 ml of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1998;42:570-577.
  • 5[5]Paqueron X, Bouaziz H, Macalou D, Labaille T, Merle M, Laxenaire MC, BenRamon D. The lateral approach to the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa: One or two injections [J]? Anesth Analg, 1999;89:1221-1225.
  • 6[6]Baranowski AP, Pither CE. A comparison of three methods of axillary brachial plexue anaesthesia[J]. Anaesthesia, 1990;45:363-365.
  • 7[7]Rucci FS, Boccaccini A, Doni L, Pippa P. The orthogonal two-needle technique: A new axillary approach to the brachial plexus [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 1995;12:333-339.
  • 8[8]VadeBocouer TR, Riegler FX. In defense of the nerve stimulator [letter] [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 1998;23:229-230.
  • 9[9]Peter JD. Anatomie et histologie des fibres et des troncs nerveux: effects secondaires des anesthesiques locaux sur les fibres nerveuses. In: Lafaye G, ed. Precis dAnesthesie loso-regionale [J]. Paris: Masson, 1994:39-50.
  • 10[10]Gaertner E, Kern O, Mahoudeau G, Freys G, Golfetto T, Calon B. Block of the brachial plexus branches by the humeral route: A prospective study of 503 ambulatory patients-proposal of a nerve blocing sequence [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1999;43:609-613.

同被引文献20

  • 1蒋学斌,徐旭仲,吴道珠,李挺,黄品同,余微萍.超声引导喙突径路锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(19):1355-1357. 被引量:17
  • 2Sia S, Bartoli M, Lepri a, et al. Multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block: a comparison of two method of nerve localization nerve stimulation versus paresthesia. Anesth Analg,2000,91:647-651.
  • 3Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Hesselbjerg L, Fejlberg V. Comparison of transarterial and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for an initial axillary block by 45ml of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Stand, 1998,42:570-575.
  • 4Liu FC, Liou JT, Tsai YF, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block: a comparative study with nerve stimulator-guided method. Chang Gung Med J, 2005, 28 : 396-402.
  • 5Schwemmer U, Markus CK, Greim CA, et al. Ultrasound-guided anesthesia of the axiilary brachial plexus: efficacy of multiple injection approach. Ulrtaschall Med,2005, 26 : 114-119.
  • 6Retzl G, Kapral S, Greher M, et al, Ultraaonographic findings of the axillary part of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg, 2001 ;92:1271-1275.
  • 7Peter JD. Anatomic et histologie des fibres et des troncs nerveuses//Lafaye G, ed. Precis aAnesthesie loso-regionale. Paris:Masson, 1994:39-50.
  • 8Gaertner E, Kern O, Mahoudeau G, et al, Block of the brachial plexus branches by the humeral route:a prospective study of 503 ambulatory patients proposal of a nerve blocking sequence. Acta Anaesthesial Scand, 1999,43:609-613.
  • 9Koscielniak-Nilsenn ZJ, Stens-Pedersen HI, Knudsen Lippet F. Readiness for axillary block: Single or multiple injection teachniques,Eur J Anaesthesiol , 1997,14: 164-171.
  • 10Kapral S, Krafft P, Eisenherger K, et at. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg ,1994, 78:507-513.

引证文献2

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部