期刊文献+

加替沙星序贯给药治疗下呼吸道细菌性感染 被引量:6

Clinical randomized controlled trials of Gatifloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections using introvenous to oral step down therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价加替 (Gatifloxacin)沙星先静脉、后口服序贯给药治疗社区获得性肺炎 (CAP)为主的下呼吸道感染的疗效与安全性。 方法 :采用随机对照盲法平行试验设计 ,入选并完成病例 5 2例 ,其中CAP 5 1例 ,慢性支气管炎急性发作 (AECB) 1例。试验组 (2 6例 )给予加替沙星注射液 4 0 0mg ,每天 1次静脉滴注 ,共 3~ 5天 ,继以加替沙星片 4 0 0mg ,每天 1次口服 ;对照组 (2 6例 )给予左旋氧氟沙星注射液 4 0 0mg/d ,分 2次静脉滴注 ,共 3~ 5天 ,继续以每天左旋氧氟沙星片 4 0 0mg/d ,分 2次服用 ,总疗程均为 7~ 1 4天。  结果 :试验组和对照组临床可评价的病例均为 2 6例 ,有效率分别为 1 0 0 % (2 6 /2 6 )和 96 .2 % (2 5 /2 6 )。痊愈率分别为 76 .9% (2 0 /2 6 )和 6 5 .4 % (1 7/2 6 ) ,差异均不显著 (P >0 .0 5 )。试验组和对照组可作细菌学评价病例分别为 1 8例和 1 9例 ,细菌清除率分别为 94 .4 %(1 7/1 8)和 6 8.4 % (1 3/1 9) (P >0 .0 5 )。试验组和对照组不良反应发生率分别为 30 .8% (8/2 6 )和 1 1 .5 % (3/6 ) ,(P>0 .0 5 )。实验室检查异常发生率各为 4 2 .3% (1 2 /2 6 )和 2 6 .9% (7/2 6 ) (P >0 .0 5 ) ,均系轻度 ,并呈一过性 ,无需处理。 结论 :本研究结果显示 。 Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gatifloxacin compared with Levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections using introvenous to oral step down therapy. Methods: A total of 52 patients (51 with community acquired pneumonia and 1 with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis)were included in this study, 26 cases treated with Gatifloxacin were compared with 26 cases treated with Levofloxacin. Drugs were first administered intravenously at a dose of 400 mg of Gatifloxacin,once a day or 200 mg of Levofloxacin, q 12 h for 3~5 days,then taked orally at a dose of 400 mg of Gatifloxacin,once a day or 400 mg of Levofloxacin, q 12 h ,the total period of treatment was 7~14 days. Results: The overall clinical efficacious rates and cure rates of Gatifloxacin was 100%, 96.2 % and 76.9%,65.4% in Levofloxacin group,There was no significant difference( P >0.05)between two group in the clinical efficacy rates and cure rates. There was also no significant difference( 94.4% to 68.4 %, P >0.05)between Gatifloxacin and Levofloxacin in the bacterial clearance rates. The incidence of adverse drug reactions(30.8%)for Gatifloxacin was low, and no severe adverse drug reactions was found. Conclusions: Gatifloxacin is an effective and safe antibiotics for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infection in introvenous to oral step down therapy.
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 2003年第8期596-599,共4页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
关键词 下呼吸道细菌感染 加替沙星 左旋氧氟沙星 静脉 口服 序贯治疗法 Lower respiratory tract Bacterial infection Gatifloxacin Levofloxacin Introvenous to oral step down therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Grasela DM. Clinical pharmacology of gatifloxacin,a new floroquinolone[J].Clin Infect Dis,2000,31(Suppl ):S51-S58.
  • 2Sullivan JG,McElroy AD,Honsinger RW et al.Treating community-acquired pneumonia with once-daily gatifloxacin vs once-daily levofloxacin[J].J Respir Dis,1999,20(suppl):S49-S59.
  • 3苏欣,施毅,夏锡荣,邵海枫,李珍大,申萍,张晓琳.加替沙星与左氧氟沙星随机对照治疗急性下呼吸道感染的临床评价[J].医学研究生学报,2002,15(2):149-151. 被引量:26
  • 4Dresser LD,Niedeman MS,Paladino JA.Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia[J].Chest,2001,119(5):1439-1448.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Grasela DM. Clinical pharmacology of gatifloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2000,31(Suppl 2) :S51-S58.
  • 2Sullivan JG, McElroy AD, Honsinger RW,et al. Treating community-acquired pneumonia with once-daily gatifloxacin vs once-daily levofloxacin[J]. J Respir Dis, 1999,20:S49-S59.
  • 3Dresser LD, Niederman MS, Paladino JA. Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Chest, 2001,119(5):1439-1448.

共引文献25

同被引文献29

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部