期刊文献+

血浆置换治疗对高敏患者肾移植后排斥反应的影响 被引量:3

Influence of plasma exchange therapy on renal transplant rejection in highly sensitive recipients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨血浆置换(PE)减少高敏患者肾移植后排斥反应的疗效。方法 46例肾移植前群体反应性抗体(PRA)阳性≥30%(30%~88%)患者,先作血浆置换治疗1~3次后,当PRA<30%才作尸体肾移植作治疗组。30例PRA阳性,强度≥30%(30%~77%)患者进行尸体肾移植作对照组。比较2组患者术后6个月内排斥反应情况。结果 对照组术后排斥反应发生率为63.3%(19/30)。治疗组移植后排斥反应发生率为21.7%(10/46),(P<0.001)。结论 PE治疗能明显减少有预先形成抗体的高敏患者的肾移植后排斥反应,疗效满意。 Objective To investigate the effect of plasma exchange(PE) therapy on reducing renal transplantation rejection in highly sensitive recipients. Methods Rejections within 6 months after renal transplantation were compared between the two groups of patients,one of which was composed of 30 recipients whose panel reactive antibody levels before the transplantation were from 30% to 77% ,and another was composed of 46 recipients whose panel reactive antibody levels were from 30% to 88%. The later group of patients received PE therapy before transplantation and had not undergone renal transplantation operation until their panel reactive antibody levels were below 30% or negative. Results After transplantation,the rejection incidence was 63. 3% (19/30) for those 30 recipients without plasma exchange therapy and 21.7% (10/46) for the 46 recipients receiving plasma exchange therapy respectively. The difference was very significant(P<0.001). Conclusion For the highly sensitive recipients who have the pre-transplant antibodies,plasma exchange therapy can significantly reduce the post - transplant rejection incidence.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第5期278-280,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
基金 广东省科学委员会攻关基金(97011)
关键词 血浆置换 治疗 高敏患者 肾移植 排斥反应 Renal transplantation Plasma exchange Panel reactive antibody Rejection
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献5

同被引文献19

  • 1吴培根,姜宗培,张仕光.群体反应性抗体检测在肾移植中的意义[J].中华肾脏病杂志,1996,12(5):282-284. 被引量:6
  • 2孙华宾,刘燕,朱耿隆,郑克立.老年人肾移植49例临床分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(11):846-848. 被引量:2
  • 3Basu A, Greenstein SM, Clemetson S, et al. Renal transplantation in patients above 60 years of age in the modern era: a single center experience with a review of the lkerature. Int Urol Nephrol, 2000, 32: 171-176.
  • 4Pascual J, van Hooff JP, Salmela K, et al. Three year observational follow-up of a multicenter, randomized trial on tacrolimus based therapy with withdrawal of steroids or mycophenolate mofetil after renal transplant. Transplantation, 2006,82 : 55-61.
  • 5Nowacka-Cieciura E, Soluch I., Cieciura T, et al. Effect of glucocorticoid free immunosuppressive protocol on serum lipids in renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc,2000,32 : 1339-1343.
  • 6Ahsan N, Hricik D, Matas A, et al. Prednisone withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil-a prospective randomized study. Steroid Withdrawal Study Group.Transplantation, 1999,68 : 1865-1874.
  • 7Vincenti F, Monaco A, Grinyo J, et al. A meta analysis of immunosuppression withdrawal trials in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2000, 11: 1910-1917.
  • 8Pascual J,Quereda C, Zamora J, et al. Updated metaanalysis of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant patients on caleineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil. Transplant Proc, 2005,37 : 3746-3748.
  • 9Tan JY,Zhao N, Wu TX, et al. Steroid withdrawal increases risk of acute rejection but reduces infection: a recta-analysis of 1681 cases in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc,2006,38:2054-2056.
  • 10Park JB, Kim SJ,Oh HY, et al. Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine : a randomized prospective study. Transpl Int, 2006, 19:478-484.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部