关于经济学“非主流”的对话

Conversation on Non-Mainstream Economics

提出“非主流”的目的,就是为了打破新自由主义在中国经济学界的垄断,防止其对于中国改革开放的误导。非主流经济学的基本点是反对市场教条,资本运动万能,主张在全球化和市场化条件下维护国家和民族利益,强化政府职能;主张以动态比较利益为出发点,以国家力量推动产业结构升级,发展独立自主的战略产业;主张以国家安全为核心进行战略调整,以低成本反对腐败;主张可持续发展,反对两极分化。这与新自由主义所谓“理性人”即资本利益为基本出发点是完全不同的。“非主流经济学家”在90年代的主要贡献不在于理论创造和决策支持,而在于打破学术垄断,维持“均衡”和思想学术自由。这在理论上本来应该是“自由主义”的任务。但是“新自由主义”经济学家反而搞学术垄断,而被他们称为“新左派”的经济学家却在实际上起着反垄断的作用,这就是历史的辩证法。

The voice of non-mainstream economics is to break the monopoly of the neo-liberalismin Chinas economics community, so as to avoid its misleading in Chinas reform and opening.The basic arguments of the non-mainstream economists in China are to break the myth ofmarket dogma and the omnipotentiality of the capitals while calling for strengthening thegovernment in safeguarding Chinas national interests in marketization and globalizationprocess. It also argues to push the restructuring of the economic structures by governmentalpower, from the starting point of dynamic comparative advantage, and to implement strategicreadjustment from the need of national security and for a clean government and sustainability.It also calls for control of the polarization in social development. These are totally differentfrom the supposition of the rational man by the neo-liberalism. The contribution of the non-mainstream economists in 1990s were not for theory construction and for policy formulation,but for breaking the academic monopoly by one school of thoughts to maintain the academicdiversity. This is supposed to be the responsibility of the liberalism but actually they in Chinaare monopolizing the academic forum while the economists labeled by them as the NewLeftare breaking the monopoly. This is the historical dialectics.