摘要
由于WTO争端解决机制中“反向协商一致”决策方式的采用,从而使WTO争端解决机构(DSB)事实上获得了对WTO成员方贸易争议的强制管辖权;国家主权原则是国际法最为首要的原则,其在司法领域的表现为任何国家不得被强迫违背其意志进行诉讼。DSB的强制管辖权与国家主权原则表面上似乎是相矛盾的,但实质上两者是一种并行不悖的关系,是在全球化背景下,国家对主权的自我限制或让渡。DSB的强制管辖权仍然是以尊重国家主权为基础的,可以说是国家主权平等原则的体现。
The DSB has virtually jurisdicted the trade disputes between the WTO members compulsorily because of the adoption of the decision-making method negative consensus in DSU. The doctrine of state sovereignty is the primary one in international law, which shows in judicial field is that no state shall be forced to take suits against its will. The compulsory jurisdiction of the DSB is seemingly contradictory to the Doctrine of State Sovereignty ,but substantially the two are compatible. It shows the state self-restricts or transfers its sovereignty on the background of globalization. The compulsory jurisdiction of the DSB is on the basis of the respection for state sovereignty and embodies the equality of state sovereignty.
