论ICCA在中国内地仲裁的可行性及法律障碍——《仲裁法》司法解释施行后的审视

以ICCA为代表的国际商事仲裁机构能否在中国内地仲裁?我国学者对此莫衷一是,在以前的司法实践中,我国法院更趋向于否定态度。这违背了我国加入WTO时的承诺,也不利于中国仲裁的国际化。2006年施行的《仲裁法》司法解释打破了这块坚冰,明确承认了ICC示范仲裁条款的有效性。但由于我国《仲裁法》中仲裁地概念的缺失,ICCA在中国内地仲裁仍会面临一些程序上的缺陷。在将来修订《仲裁法》的过程中,我们必须对仲裁地和仲裁裁决的国籍作出明确规定,并补充适用于国际商事仲裁的临时措施条款。

Are international arbitration institutions,taking ICCA as an example,allowed to arbitrate in P.R.China,where it is defined as the seat of arbitration?The Chinese scholars’opinions are widely divided on this issue,and,in the former judicial judgements,the Chinese courts inclined to hold negative views on it.However,this practice violated the commitments made by the Chinese Government when it acceded to the WTO.Furthermore,it is unfavorable to realize the Internationalization of Chinese Arbitration Industry.The judicial interpretation of Chinese Arbitration Law,enforced in 2006,made an important breakthrough.For the first time,the ICC Standard Arbitration Clause is recognized as valid,in the definite sense.However,there is still no idea of Seat of Arbitration,as ever in Chinese Arbitration Law,in this judicial interpretation.Thus,some procedural drawbacks remain,making it difficult for the foreign arbitration institutions,like ICCA,to arbitrate in P.R.China.In the prospective amendments of Chinese Arbitration Law,it is the primary work to make a clear provision to the seat and nationality of arbitration.And also,an ad hoc arbitration clause,especially applied for international commercial arbitration,needs to be supplemented to it.