摘要
人民法院对于仲裁的事后监督主要通过撤销仲裁裁决和不予执行仲裁裁决。学界多趋向于取消不予执行仲裁裁决这一司法监督方式,但在目前的法律框架下,从实务的角度全面规范不予执行仲裁裁决并协调好不予执行仲裁裁决与撤销仲裁裁决两者的关系,与单纯地批判相比,显然有建设意义得多。本文从不予执行仲裁裁决与撤销仲裁裁决的冲突入手,以广东省高级人民法院《关于办理申请不予执行仲裁裁决案件的若干规定(试行)》的相关规定为主线,论证了不予执行仲裁裁决的双重标准、法律后果、审查部门、审查程序、救济途径等,以期能够推动不予执行仲裁裁决相关工作的规范化。
The supervision afterwards of People’s Court on the arbitration includes the cancellation of arbitral awards and non ntforcement of aibitr awards.Law circle tends to cancel the non enforcement of arbitral awards,but on the frame of our law system,to standard and coordmate the relationship between the cancellation of arbitral awards and non enforcement of arbitral awards is more constructive.This pqjer,from the perspective of the conflicts between the cancellation of arbitral awards and non enforcement of arbitral awards,demonstrates the double standard,legal consequence,examination department,review process and relief approach.
出处
《武汉仲裁》
2013年第1期41-45,共5页
Arbitration of Wuhan
关键词
仲裁
裁决
不予执行
撤销
Arbitration
Abitral awards
Non-enforcement
Cancellation