两岸四地间相互执行仲裁裁决:过去、现在及将来(下)

Approaches of Mutual Enforcement of China's Mainland and Hong Kong,Macao,Taiwan Arbitral Awards(Part Two)

(续上期)五、内地执行港澳台地区的仲裁裁决改革开放以来,内地与港澳台地区在经济上的一体化迹象越来越明显。与此同时,跨地区的民商事纠纷也越来越多。在这样一个大环境下,执行港澳台地区的仲裁裁决是内地法院面临的新任务。从内地的角度看,执行港澳地区的裁决与执行台湾地区的裁决有所不同。本节亦分两个部分叙述。

Based on a comparative study of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China's Mainland,Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan,law and practice of mutual enforcement of China's Mainland,Hong Kong and Macao arbitration awards before and after'One Country,Two System'coming into force as well as that of acknowledgement and enforcement of China's Mainland and Taiwan arbitration awards,this paper opines that the 1958 New York Convention should be borrowed to unify enforcement of interregional arbitration awards in China.While the substance of New York Convention has been adopted for China's Mainland and Hong Kong,Macao arbitration awards,both sides across the Strait take the other’s arbitral awards as sui generis,neither foreign nor domestic,which obviously prejudice to the effectiveness of corss-straitenforcement of arbitration awards.The author raises that each side should reconsider its policy and keep pace with international general practice in order to unify enforcement of interregional arbitration awards in China and promote arbitration’s service quality to interregional commercial transactions.