摘要
临时仲裁被认为是仲裁的'原始形式',比起机构仲裁具有更充分尊重当事人意思自治、程序更灵活、仲裁庭权力更大以及成本较低等特点。我国法律中临时仲裁长期缺失,对于是否应当引进临时仲裁也存在争议。在此情况下,中国互联网仲裁联盟顺应时势发布了《临时仲裁与机构仲裁对接规则》,并在实践中取得巨大成功。临时仲裁在中国内地的实践,既要学习国际商事仲裁的先进经验,也要充分考虑中国的实际情况,同时需要借助日新月异的互联网技术并体现时代精神。
Ad hoc arbitration has been viewed as original model of arbitration,featuring higher autonomy,more flexibility,greater power of tribunal and lower cost.Whilst it has long been debated that whether China should introduce ad hoc arbitration,whereas the statute is silent on this issue.Against the backdrop,the Rules for Bridging ad hoc Arbitration and Institutional Arbitration released by China Internet Arbitration Alliance,which features a combination ad hoc arbitration,institutional arbitration and online arbitration has raised concerns over arbitration practitioners in China and achieved great success.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2019年第2期1-10,共10页
Arbitration Study
关键词
临时仲裁
机构仲裁
互联网仲裁
ad hoc Arbitration
Institutional Arbitration
Online Arbitration