期刊文献+

人牙咬痕同一认定数字化分析的盲法评定 被引量:7

The blind assessment of human bitemarks by digital analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评定人牙咬痕同一认定数字化分析方法的精确性。方法 采用数字化分析法对人牙咬痕及8名“疑犯”牙列模型进行双盲法分析实验,用Photoshop 5.5将获得的咬痕扫描图像生成overlay,用AutoCAD Rl4工程测量软件分析各项参数,比较人牙咬痕和“疑犯”牙列参数的匹配性。结果人牙咬痕及“疑犯”牙列模型数据化分析的各项参数分析结果一致。结论对于试验性咬痕,数字化分析是一种可行的认定方法,对法医学实践具有可行性及良好的应用前景。 Objective Digital analysis of human bitemarks by blind method was assessed for its accura-cy. Method Digital analysis was used in double-blind method for identification of human bitemarks with control samples from 8 suspects. Photoshop 5.5 generates an overlay from bitemarks scanned and various coefficients were submitted for analysis by AutoCAD R14 engineering software to compare bitemarks with denture of suspects. Results Digital analysis shows that bitemarks tally with cast of denture from 'suspects' in every coefficient. Conclusion Digital analysis is feasible for identification of experimental bitemarks and promises sound prospects in future forensic practice.
出处 《中国法医学杂志》 CSCD 2003年第6期335-338,共4页 Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
基金 公安部科技局资助项目(2000522001)
关键词 人牙咬痕 同一认定 数字化分析 盲法评定 法医人类学 Forensic anthropology Human bitemarks Identification Double blind method Digital analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Edward DW, William GE. Indroduction to Forensic Sciences.Forensic Dentisry [M]. the CV Mosby CO, 1980. 114
  • 2DK Whittaker. Some Laboratory Studies on the Accuracy of Bite Mark Comparison. Lecture in Oral Biology [ M]. Welsh National School of Medicine, The Heath, Cardiff, United Kindom
  • 3Rawson RD, Vale GL, Sperber ND, et al. Realibility of the Scoring System of the American Board of Forensic Odontology for Human Bite Marks [J]. J Forensic Sci, 1986, 31 (4):1235
  • 4American Board of Forensic Odontology, Inc. Guidelines For Bite Mark Analysis [ J ]. J American Dental Assosiation,1986, 112 (3):383
  • 5Norman GR, Streiner DL. Chapter 13, Hotelling's and Manova: analysis of variance (MAHNOVA). PDO Statistics,Decker, Toronto, 1986, 119
  • 6Manly BFJ. Distances between populations and samples [ M].Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall,London, 1986. 47
  • 7Manly BFJ. Doscrimination using mahalanobis distances [ M].Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall,London, 1986. 87338
  • 8David S, Michel B. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: A comparion of five common methods of produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition [J]. J Forensic Sci, 1998, 43 (2): 362
  • 9David S, Mark P. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays [ J ]. J Forensic Sci, 1998, 43 (5):1050
  • 10Naru AS, Dykes E. The use of a digital imaging techaique to aid bite mark analysis [J]. Sci Justice, 1996, 36 (1): 47

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部