摘要
《民法总则》在正确处理其与《涉外民事关系法律适用法》关系的同时,也对《涉外民事关系法律适用法》作了相应回应。这种回应,既反映出民法与国际私法功能及概念的差异性及民法典本身体系协调的需要,也反映出国际私法立法仍待完善。无论是从民法典体系本身的协调而言,还是从国际私法的特殊性与重要功能来看,二者在立法形式上保持各自独立性是必要的。
General Provisions of the Civil Law not only correctly deals with relationship with Law on Choice of Law for Foreign - related Civil Relationships,but also makes corresponding response to the Law on Choice of Law for Foreign - related Civil Relationships. The response reflects the difference of function and concept between private international law and civil law,and also reflects the need for coordinating the civil law system and perfecting private international law legislation. From the perspective of relationship between civil law and private international law, it is necessary to keep independence respectively on legislation based on the coordination of civil law system and critical function as well as the specificity of private international law.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期3-16,共14页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDC032)"中国涉外民事关系法体系完善研究"
中国法学会2017年部级重大课题"构建人类命运共同体的国际法律问题研究"(批准号:CLS(2017)A02)的阶段性成果
关键词
民法总则
涉外民事关系法律适用法
民法典
General Provisions of the Civil Law
Law on Choice of Law for Foreign - related Civil Relationships
Civil Code