期刊文献+

考虑乘客有限理性的Littlewood存量分配模型 被引量:1

The Littlewood Capacity Allocation Model with Bounded-Rational Passengers
原文传递
导出
摘要 不同于已有的收益管理模型将乘客行为认定为短视或绝对理性的假设,本文考虑了乘客的有限理性行为特征,在此基础上对经典的Littlewood存量控制模型进行了修正计算。本文以民航客运为行业背景,用离散选择模型刻画低票价乘客的选择行为,采用Kahneman和Tversky的价值函数度量乘客效用,并选取乘客支付意愿为参考点,基于此乘客决策规则计算低票价乘客的转移概率,以此修正高票价需求分布,计算最终的存量分配方案。算例分析结果表明,修正后的计算方法能够显著增加航班收益。 Classical Littlewood model is improved based on the assumption that the customers' behavior is bounded-rational.The improved model is different from the current revenue management models that assume the customers myopic or absolutely rational.Firstly the airline passengers' behavior is described.Discrete choice model is used to characterize low-price passengers' choice behavior,Kahneman and Tversky's value function is introduced to measure passengers' utility,and passengers' reserve value is chosen as reference point.Based on these decision rules,the transfer probability of the low-price passengers is calculated,the demand distribution of the high-price passengers is modified,and the final capacity allocation is computed.The numerical example shows that the improved model can significantly improve the flight's revenue.
作者 杨慧 陈兰
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第S1期175-179,共5页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71102073 71172105)
关键词 收益管理 存量分配 有限理性 前景理论 revenue management capacity allocation bounded rationality prospect theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献71

  • 1Ferdows K, Lewis M A, et al. Rapid-fire fulfillment [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2004, 82(11): 104- 110.
  • 2Elmaghraby W, Keskinocak P. Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: research overview, current practices, and future directions[J]. Manage- ment Science, 2003, 49(10): 1287-1309.
  • 3Petruzzi N C, Wee K E, Dada M. The Newsvendor model with consumer search costs[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(6) : 693-704.
  • 4Yin Rui, Aviv Y, Pazgal A, et al. Optimal markdown pricing., implications of inventory display formats in the presence of strategic customers[J]. Management Sci- ence, 2009, 55(8): 1391-1408.
  • 5Elmaghraby W, Lippman S A, Tang C S, et al. Will more purchasing options benefit customers[J]. Produc- tion and Operations Management, 2009, 18(4): 381- 401.
  • 6Yin Rui, Aviv Y, Pazgal A, et al. Optimat markdown pricing., implications of inventory display formats in the presence of strategic customers[J]. Management Sci- ence, 2009, 55(8): 1391-1408.
  • 7Cho M H,Fan Ming,Zhou Yongpin. Strategic consumer response to dynamic pricing of perishable products [M]//Tang C S, Netessine S. Operations management mod- els with consumer-driven demand. New York.. Spring- er, 2009.
  • 8Levin Y, Mcgill J, Nediak M. Optimal dynamic pricing of perishable items by a monopolist facing strategic con- sumers[J]. Production and Operations Management,2010, 19(1): 40-60.
  • 9Elmaghraby W, Gulcu A, Keskinocak P. Designing op timal preannounced markdowns in the presence of ra tional customers with multiunit demands[J]. Manufac turing Service Operations Management, 2008, 10 (1) :126-148.
  • 10Dasu S, Tong C. Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes [J]. European Journal of Operational Re search, 2010, 204(3): 662-671.

共引文献59

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部