期刊文献+

公平偏好下多渠道零售商线上线下同价策略选择分析 被引量:26

Online-Offline Uniform Pricing Strategy of Multi-Channel Retailer Based on Fairness Preferences
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了多渠道零售商是否选择线上线下同价策略的问题,将消费者价格公平偏好引入到传统多渠道的研究中,根据消费者行为的表现,对公平偏好进行了分类:不对称公平和对称公平。通过理论模型分析发现:1)当消费者对线上渠道接受程度较高,并且有足够强的公平偏好时,多渠道零售商选择线上线下同价策略是最优均衡;2)当消费者对该零售商线上渠道接受较低时,公平偏好对定价策略没有影响,也即零售商选择差别定价是最优均衡;3)对称性的公平会提高差别定价策略下的零售商的利润,会降低同价策略下的零售商的利润,公平偏好一定程度上能够缓和线上线下渠道间的价格竞争。所以公平偏好是多渠道零售商采取线上线下同价策略的驱动机制之一,零售商有动机采取线上线下同价策略。 In this paper,online-offline uniform pricing strategy of the multi-channel retailer is studied.Multi-channel retailers,consisting of online and offline channel,begin to adopt the uniform price strategy on same products from different channels.For example,Suning Commerce(the biggest electronics retailer in China)announced that it would be same price of offline and online products since 2013.At the same time,some other multi-channel retailers also consider it as the important price strategy in the era of Ecommerce.In fact,puzzling because demand tends to be different across different types of marketing channel,and standard economic and marketing theory would suggest differential prices in those situations.To understand the puzzling aspect of uniform pricing strategy,it is explained based on consumers' fairness preferences.Generally,we are interested in analyzing three research questions.First,a model of fairness is presented,and it is expected the pricing strategy will arise as an equilibrium.Second,the implications of uniform pricing strategy are further understood,and if so,how the consumers' fairness can effect?Third,whether the multi-channel retailers can deviate from uniform pricing strategy and what conditions can mediate is examined?The functions of fairness preferenceθand online channel acceptanceδby consumers are emphasized.These three questions are important to multi-channel retailers because they are related with the long-run development of firms.Consumers' concern on price fairness is incorporated into a basic theoretical model and the fairness preference is defined by two types,symmetrical fairness and asymmetrical fairness.The results show that:First,a uniform price between online and offline may emerge in unique equilibrium,if consumers' concerns of price fairness are strong enough and the online channel is well accepted by consumers.Second,the multi-retailer will choose price discrimination strategy between channels if the online channel is not accepted by consumers and the fairness will not affect the price decision of retailer.Third,The asymmetrical fairness will improve the profits of retailer when she choose price discrimination and lower the profits for the uniform price strategy,it means that the fairness can mitigate the price competition between different channels.As a result,consumers' fairness preference is a mechanism for online-offline uniform pricing strategy of multi-channel retailer.There are two implications for multi-channel retailers.First,the retailers may have an incentive to adopt the uniform pricing strategy for different channels for the reason that the uniform pricing can be induced by consumers' fairness concerns may increase the total demand of all retailers.Second,the retailers with integrated channel(such as Suning)will have more incentive to accept uniform pricing,that means it may affect the equilibrium channel structure.So the uniform pricing strategy can soften competition of the different channels of retailer,and the important roles of uniform pricing should be emphasized.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期121-129,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71202005 71202175) 上海教委"晨光计划"资助项目(2014111068)
关键词 多渠道零售商 线上线下 同价 公平偏好 multi-channel retailer online-offline uniform price fairness preference
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献138

  • 1Frank Y. CHEN,S. H. HUM,Cheryl H. SIM.ON INVENTORY STRATEGIES OF ONLINE RETAILERS[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2005,14(1):52-72. 被引量:1
  • 2陈洁,王方华,赵昌平.基于不对称信息博弈的营销渠道联盟形成机理[J].上海交通大学学报,2005,39(10):1596-1599. 被引量:8
  • 3蔡建湖,黄卫来,周根贵.基于收益分享契约的VMI模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(4):108-113. 被引量:53
  • 4Bakos J Y.Reducing buyer search costs:Implications for electronic marketplaces[J].Management Science,1997,43 (12):1676-1692.
  • 5Lal R,Sarvary M.When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition?[J].Marketing Science,1999,18(4):485-503.
  • 6Brynjolfsson E,Smith M D.Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers[J].Management Science,2000,46(4):563-585.
  • 7Chen P Y,Hitt L M.A model of price dispersion in internet-enabled markets[R].Working paper,Graduate School of Industrial Administration,Carnegie Mellon University,2004.
  • 8Smith M D,Bailey J,Brynjolfsson E.Understanding digital markets:Review and assessment.Working paper,MIT Sloan School,Available at http://ecommerce.mit.edu/papers/ude,1999.
  • 9Friberg R,Ganslandt M,Sandstrom M.E-commerce and prices-theory and evidence.Working paper series in economics and Finance No 389,Stockholm School of Economics,Sweden,2000.
  • 10Friberg R,Ganslandt M,Sandstrom M.Pricing strategies in e-commerce:Bricks vs.clicks.Working paper,Stockholm School of Economics,Sweden,2001.

共引文献362

同被引文献245

引证文献26

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部