期刊文献+

心理阈值协同视角下的群体评价方法及应用 被引量:7

Group Evaluation Method and Its Application from the Psychological Threshold Cooperation Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对传统群体评价方法均不考虑评价者存在的心理阈值这一现象,提出一种心理阈值协同的群体评价方法。首先,将心理阈值协同的群体评价方法进行了前提假设与过程描述;其次,构建极大型、极小型、居中型、区间型指标相应的群体赋值心理阈值量化算法,根据量化后的心理阈值对评价值矩阵进行调整;再次,给出了群体指标赋权的心理阈值量化及权重值矩阵调整方法;最后,对调整后的评价值矩阵与权重值矩阵进行集结,得出最终评价结果。具体算例表明,该方法有效且可行。 In the face of complex evaluation problems it requires the joint participation of multiple evaluators,which is termed group evaluation.Normally there are some different evaluation results from different evaluators in the group evaluation process.The differences are composed of evaluators' rational analysis and subjective psychological effect.In which rational analysis as experience or knowledge is objective and difficult to change.Thus,reduce group evaluators' subjective psychological effect results is an important part of rational group evaluation process design.Psychological threshold is an essential component of the subjective psychological effect.It is defined as:psychological qualitative critical point that just can cause feelings or perceived differences in the minimum amount of stimulation.Different evaluators' psychological threshold would lead to some deviations between evaluation result and true value.The psychological threshold differences are produced during the process of evaluators score on evaluated objects' index values or assign weighs according to the degree of importance.Therefore,a new method of group evaluation is proposed based on psychological threshold synergistic.Firstly,the presumption and process description of psychological threshold group evaluation is described.Secondly,the psychological threshold assignment arithmetic of corresponding efficiency indicator,cost indicator,central indicator and interval indicator is structured.Then the evaluation matrix can be adjusted by the psychological threshold assignment.Thirdly,the psychological threshold assignment of group indicators weighting and the adjustment of indicators weighting matrix are put forward.Finally,the adjustment matrixes are aggregation and the result of the group evaluation which is closer to the real value is gotten.Specific example indicates that the method is effective and feasible.Moreover the evaluation results of traditional and new test methods are not equivalent.This method has been expanded to the traditional group evaluation.In response to this shortage of traditional method doesn’t consider the effect on different psychological threshold,preliminary solutions are presented.The method enables subjective evaluation information from group evaluators achieves a better coordination and unity.The rationality and reliability of the evaluation results can be improved.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期158-163,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71671031) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(N130406004)
关键词 综合评价 心理阈值 主观赋值 主观赋权 信息集结 comprehensive evaluation psychological threshold subjective assignment ojective assignment information aggregation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献93

  • 1刘海波.政策评价框架下的规制影响分析[J].科学对社会的影响,2004,48(3):12-15. 被引量:9
  • 2梁,熊立,王国华.一种群决策中专家客观权重的确定方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(4):652-655. 被引量:79
  • 3周宏安,刘三阳.基于二次规划与相对优势度的不确定多属性决策法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(4):559-562. 被引量:15
  • 4易平涛,郭亚军,张丹宁.密度加权平均中间算子及其在多属性决策中的应用[J].控制与决策,2007,22(5):515-519. 被引量:54
  • 5Dyer,J. S. , Fishburn, P. C. , Steuer, P. E. , Wallenius, J. ,Zionts, S.. Multiple criteria decision making, multi- attribute utility theory: The next ten years [J]. Man- agement Science, 1992,38 ( 5 ) : 645 -- 654.
  • 6Wallenius, J. , Dyer, J. S. , Fishburn, P. C. , Steuer, R. E. , Zionts, S. , Deb, K.. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accom- plishments and what lies ahead [J]. Management Sci- ence,2008,54(7) :1336--1349.
  • 7Wang,Y. M. , Luo,Y.. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2010,51(1--2):1--12.
  • 8Fu, C. , Yang, S.L.. An attribute weight based feed- back method for multiple Attributive group decision a- nalysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011,212 : 179-- 189.
  • 9Hwang ,C. L. , Yoon, K.. Multiple Attribute Deci sion Making and Applications [ M]. New York Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  • 10玄光男 程润伟.遗传算法与工程优化[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004..

共引文献80

同被引文献92

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部