摘要
在2018年由复旦大学中文系等主办的'传承与构建——中国古典美学高端论坛'会场上,朱立元、陈望衡、张法、王振复、刘成纪、朱志荣、祁志祥等学者认真讨论了中国美学史如何建构和书写的问题,留下了许多有价值的宝贵意见,有助于推动中国美学史写作更加的全面深入。本文主要侧重于结合一系列与建构中国美学史相关的问题,有所选择地摘引论坛中多位名家相关的发言实录加以说明,并借此发表个人的些许心得体会,也借此对最新出版的祁志祥《中国美学全史》(五卷本)在主要特点方面加以评判。本文从引述发言实录中归纳出来的观点有五方面:中国美学史写作的艰巨性成共识、回顾近百年中国美学史写作历程、中国美学史写作应该与西方有别、中国美学史研究要关注巫性美学、中国美学史到底应如何书写。
Zhu Liyuan,Chen Wangheng,Zhang Fa,Wang Zhenfu,Liu Chengji,Zhu Zhirong,Qi Zhixiang and other scholars,on the'Inheritance and Construction—High-end Forum of Chinese Classical Aesthetics'which is sponsored by Chinese Department of Fu Dan University at July in 2018,discuss how to construct and write the history of Chinese aesthetics,and form many valuable opinions,which is helpful to promote the writing of the history of Chinese aesthetics to be more comprehensive and deeper.This paper mainly focus on combining with a series of problems related to the construction of Chinese aesthetics,interprets the quotations form several scholars’speeches,expresses some feelings and experiences of author himself,and makes reviews on the main characteristics of the latest publication five volumes The History of Chinese Aesthetics.There are five points of view in this paper:reaching a consensus on the difficulty of writing the history of Chinese aesthetics;reviewing the writing process of the history of Chinese aesthetics in the past 100 years;making clear that the writing of the history of Chinese aesthetics should be different from that of the West;focusing on the nature of sorcery of Chinese aesthetics;concentrating on how to write the history of Chinese aesthetics.
