摘要
根据区域不同条件和特点,推进实施差别化发展和环保战略越来越受到管理者的认可。管理主体、施策目标、考虑因素、时间跨度的不同,导致空间划分格局上的差异。广东省环境保护规划和广东省主体功能区规划各自从环保分区指导和国土空间开发格局的角度,分别提出了三级控制区划和四类主体功能区的划分方案,两者区域交叉重叠,配套环境政策不尽相同,给实际的环境管理带来一定困难。通过对两个规划区划体系进行的空间叠加分析,认为可以将环境保护规划提出的严格控制区和主体功能区规划中提出的禁止开发区进行综合,划定为省域生态红线,进行统一的强制性保护。并在两者其他区叠加分析结果的基础上,从空间准入、行业准入和项目准入等层面对构建差异化环保准入政策体系进行了探讨。
Due to different conditions and characteristics of the regions,promoting the implementations of differentiated developing and environmental protection strategies is gradually accepted by the managers. Spatial division patterns can differ from lots of factors such as the managers,the goals,the considerations and the time spans. A spatial scheme of three level ecological control areas was proposed in the Guangdong provincial environmental plan,whereas a spatial scheme of four types of functional areas was proposed in the Guangdong provincial functional areas plan,from environmental zoning guidance and land use developing pattern consideration,separately. This actually brings implementation difficulties because the two schemes crossed and overlapped each other and had different supporting environmental policies. In this paper,one solution was suggested that the ecological strict area and the development-prohibited area can be merged,based on the superimposed distribution analysis of the two plans mentioned above. This paper also had a discussion on how to build an environmental access policy system containing different strategies for each area,spatial access,industry access and project access was discussed,separately.
出处
《中国人口·资源与环境》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第S2期44-47,共4页
China Population,Resources and Environment
关键词
生态控制区
主体功能区
环保准入
空间准入
差异化
ecological control area
functional areas
environmental access policy
spatial access policy
differential