期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术后双胎妊娠自然减胎对妊娠结局的影响 被引量:7

Effects of spontaneous pregnancy reduction in twin pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology on pregnancy outcomes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较辅助生殖技术双胎妊娠自然减胎与单胎的妊娠结局。方法回顾2008年1月1日至2017年12月31日北京大学第一医院辅助生殖技术双胎妊娠自然减胎121例,早期减胎95例(早期减胎组)及中期减胎26例(中期减胎组),同期320例单胎纳入对照组。对3组进行一般情况、早产及产科结局比较。结果中期减胎组新生儿出生体重低于早期减胎组及对照组[(2361.54±724.07)g、(3144.42±506.73)g、(3332.23±493.32)g],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而早产、新生儿窒息、转入NICU、低出生体重、胎儿生长受限及胎盘早剥发生率高于早期减胎组及对照组(P<0.05)。早期减胎组新生儿出生体重低于对照组,而早产率高于对照组(P<0.05)。3组凝血指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论辅助生殖技术自然减胎会导致新生儿出生体重下降及早产增加,中期自然减胎增加不良妊娠结局。 Objective To compare the pregnancy outcomes between the spontaneous reduction in twin pregnancy and the singleton pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology(ART).Methods A total of 121 cases of spontaneous reduction in twin pregnancy,who received ART at the Reproductive Center of Peking University First Hospital from January 1,2008 to December 31,2017,were included in the study,and were divided into early and middle spontaneous reduction groups with 95 and 26 cases in each group.Simultaneously,320 women with a singleton pregnancy were recruited as controls.Characteristics compared included the general condition of pregnant women,preterm birth as well as obstetric pregnancy outcomes.Results The overall birth weight in middle spontaneous reduction group was lower than that in early spontaneous reduction group and control group[(2361.54±724.07)g,(3144.42±506.73)g,(3332.23±493.32)g](P<0.05).Furthermore,higher rate of preterm birth,neonatal asphyxia,transfer to NICU,low birth weight,fetal growth restriction,and placental abruption rate was found in middle spontaneous reduction group than in early spontaneous reduction group and control group(P<0.05).The lower birth weight and higher rate of preterm birth were found in early spontaneous reduction group(P<0.05).However,no significant difference was found in coagulation indicators in 3 groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Spontaneous reduction under ART is associated with lower birth weight and higher incidence of premature delivery,whereas middle spontaneous reduction is associated with increased adverse pregnancy outcomes.
作者 赵叶芳 孙瑜 ZHAO Ye-fang;SUN Yu(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
出处 《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第10期1126-1129,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
基金 2017北京大学第一医院青年临床研究专项
关键词 辅助生殖技术 双胎妊娠 自然减胎 妊娠结局 assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancy spontaneous reduction pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献46

  • 1唐立新,王奇玲,文任乾,艾玲保,黄健初,马春杰,钟兴明.广东省初婚夫妇不孕症发病率现状调查[J].中国预防医学杂志,2005,6(2):106-108. 被引量:54
  • 2王谢桐,李红燕,冯浩,左常婷,陈延琴,李樑,吴美琳.多胎妊娠妇女孕中期选择性减胎术的临床应用[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(3):152-156. 被引量:22
  • 3丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:75-76.
  • 4Evans MI, Britt DW. Fetal reduction. Semin Perinatol, 2005, 29:321-329.
  • 5Evans MI, Ciorica D, Britt DW. Do reduced multiples do better?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 18:601-612.
  • 6Geva E, Fait G, Yovel I, et ah Second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction facilitates prenatal diagnosis before the procedure. Fertil Steril, 2000, 73:505-508.
  • 7Lipitz S, Shulman A, Achiron R, et al. A comparative study of multifetal pregnancy reduction from triplets to twins in the first versus early second trimesters after detailed fetal screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 18:35-38.
  • 8Breathnach FM, Malone FD. Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations. Semin Perinatol, 2012, 36: 175-181.
  • 9Hwang JL, Pan HS, Huang LW, et al. Comparison of the outcomes of primary twin pregnancies and twin pregnancies following fetal reduction. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2002, 267: 60-63.
  • 10Nevo O, Avisar E, Tamir A, et al. Neonatal course and outcome of twins from reduced multifetal pregnancy versus non reduced twins. Isr Med Assoc J, 2003, 5:245-248.

共引文献69

同被引文献56

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部