期刊文献+

Comparison between iterative wavefront control algorithm and direct gradient wavefront control algorithm for adaptive optics system 被引量:1

Comparison between iterative wavefront control algorithm and direct gradient wavefront control algorithm for adaptive optics system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Among all kinds of wavefront control algorithms in adaptive optics systems, the direct gradient wavefront control algorithm is the most widespread and common method. This control algorithm obtains the actuator voltages directly from wavefront slopes through pre-measuring the relational matrix between deformable mirror actuators and Hartmann wavefront sensor with perfect real-time characteristic and stability. However, with increasing the number of sub-apertures in wavefront sensor and deformable mirror actuators of adaptive optics systems, the matrix operation in direct gradient algorithm takes too much time, which becomes a major factor influencing control effect of adaptive optics systems. In this paper we apply an iterative wavefront control algorithm to high-resolution adaptive optics systems, in which the voltages of each actuator are obtained through iteration arithmetic, which gains great advantage in calculation and storage. For AO system with thousands of actuators, the computational complexity estimate is about O(n2) ~ O(n3) in direct gradient wavefront control algorithm, while the computational complexity estimate in iterative wavefront control algorithm is about O(n) ~(O(n)3/2), in which n is the number of actuators of AO system. And the more the numbers of sub-apertures and deformable mirror actuators, the more significant advantage the iterative wavefront control algorithm exhibits. Among all kinds of wavefront control algorithms in adaptive optics systems, the direct gradient wavefront control algorithm is the most widespread and common method. This control algorithm obtains the actuator voltages directly from wavefront slopes through pre-measuring the relational matrix between deformable mirror actuators and Hartmann wavefront sensor with perfect real-time characteristic and stability. However, with increasing the number of sub-apertures in wavefront sensor and deformable mirror actuators of adaptive optics systems, the matrix operation in direct gradient algorithm takes too much time, which becomes a major factor influencing control effect of adaptive optics systems. In this paper we apply an iterative wavefront control algorithm to high-resolution adaptive optics systems, in which the voltages of each actuator are obtained through iteration arithmetic, which gains great advantage in calculation and storage. For AO system with thousands of actuators, the computational complexity estimate is about O(n2) ~ O(n3) in direct gradient wavefront control algorithm, while the computational complexity estimate in iterative wavefront control algorithm is about O(n) ~(O(n)3/2), in which n is the number of actuators of AO system. And the more the numbers of sub-apertures and deformable mirror actuators, the more significant advantage the iterative wavefront control algorithm exhibits.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第8期391-397,共7页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Key Scientific and Research Equipment Development Project of China(Grant No.ZDYZ2013-2) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.11173008) the Sichuan Provincial Outstanding Youth Academic Technology Leaders Program,China(Grant No.2012JQ0012)
关键词 adaptive optics iterative wavefront control algorithm direct gradient wavefront control algorithm adaptive optics,iterative wavefront control algorithm,direct gradient wavefront control algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Wattellier B, Fuchs J, Zou J P, Abdeli K, Haefner C and Pepin H 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 5186.
  • 2Bahk S W, Rousseau P, Planchon T A, Chvykov V, Kalintchenko G, Maksimchuk A, Mourou G A and Yanovsky V 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 2837.
  • 3Fourmaux S, Payeur S, Alexandrov A, Serbanescu C, Martin F, Ozaki T, Kudryashov A and Kieffer J C 2008 Opt. Express 16 11987.
  • 4Yanovsky V, Chvykov V, Kalinchenko G, Rousseau P, Planchon T, Matsuoka T, Maksimchuk A, Nees J, Cheriaux G, Mourou G and Krushelnick K 2008 Opt. Express 16 2109.
  • 5Cao Z L, Mu Q Q, Hu L F, Liu Y G, Peng Z H and Xuan L 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 989.
  • 6Druon F, Cheriaux G, Faure J, Nees J, Nantel M, Maksimchuk A, Mourou G, Chanteloup J C and Vdovin G 1998 Opt. Lett. 23 1043.
  • 7Planchon T A, Rousseau J -P, Burgy F, Cheriaux G and Chambaret J P 2005 Opt. Commun. 252 222.
  • 8Alexandrov A, Kudryashov A, Rukosuev A, Samaxkin V and Zavalova V 2006 IEEE LFNM 29 344.
  • 9Bahk S W, Rousseau P, Planchon T A, Chvykov V, Kalintchenko C, Maksimchuk A, Mourou G A and Yanovsky V 2005 Appl. Phys. B 80 823.
  • 10Planchon T A, Amir W, Field J J, Durfee C G, Squier J A, Rousse P, Albert O and Mourou G 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 2214.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部