期刊文献+

多个连续性共同终点非劣效临床试验的样本量估计

Sample Size Determination with Multiple Co-primary Continuous Endpoints in Non-inferiority Trials
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的针对多个以连续性正态分布变量作为共同终点的非劣效临床试验,探讨保护全局把握度的样本量估计方法。方法在阐明优效性临床试验多个连续性共同终点样本量估计的理论基础上,扩展提出了关于非劣效临床试验多个连续分布共同终点的样本量估计方法。结合临床麻醉学中一个重复测量终点非劣效临床试验的实际案例,基于其预试验的相关结果,在不同的I类错误水平、各重复测量间不同的相关系数、不同的非劣效界值设定下,估计了满足一定的全局把握度(例如80%)的样本量,并借助Monte-Carlo模拟方法对估计结果进行验证。结果本文介绍的非劣效临床试验多个连续性正态分布共同终点的样本量估计方法具有严密的统计理论基础,表明能较好的保护全局把握度,结合实际案例进行的样本量估计结果模拟研究验证了方法的正确性。结论本文为非劣效临床试验多个连续分布共同终点的样本量估计提供了方法学支持,具有较强的实用价值。 Objective To explore a sample size determination that protects overall power in non-inferiority clinical trials with multiple co-primary continuous endpoints.Methods Based on theoretical analysis of the sample size determination with co-primary endpoints in superiority clinical trials,the sample size determination with multiple co-primary continuous endpoints was proposed in non-inferiority clinical trials and was applied in clinical anaesthesiology to estimate the sample size which is repeated measurement.According to pre-experiment,the sample size was estimated to control the overall power(eg.80%) with different levels of the type I error rate,different correlation coefficients and different non-inferiority margins among continuous normal distribution variables.The Monte Carlo simulation method is used to verify the estimation result.Results The sample size determination in co-primary continuous endpoints in non-inferiority clinical trials described in this paper has a strict statistical theory basis and could protect the overall power better which is verified by Monte Carlo simulation with the case study.Conclusion The method in the paper provides methodological support for the sample size determination with co-primary continuous endpoints in a non-inferiority clinical trials which has strong practical value.
作者 周憧憧 陆梦洁 刘玉秀 陈羽 刘甜甜 刘雅琦 占文强 赵施施 Zhou Chongchong;Lu Mengjie;Liu Yuxiu(Department of Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing(211166),Nanjing)
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期18-21,27,共5页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81473066)
关键词 非劣效临床试验 共同终点 全局把握度 样本量 MONTE-CARLO模拟 Non-inferiority clinical trials Co-primary endpoints Overall power Sample size Monte-Carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1黄正南.两个总体均数和两个总体率等价或差别有实际意义的统计推断[J].数理医药学杂志,1993,6(1):25-28. 被引量:5
  • 2Chuang-Stein C, Stryszak P, Dmitrienko A, et al. Challenge of multiple co-primary endpoints : a new approach. Stat Med, 2007,26 ( 6 ) : 1181 - 1192.
  • 3Sankoh A J, Sr DRB,Huque MF. Efficacy endpoint selection and multi- plicity adjustment methods in clinical trials with inherent multiple end- point issues. Stat Med,2003,22(20) :3133-3150.
  • 4Eaton ML, Muirhead RJ. On a multiple endpoints testing problem. Jour- nal of Statistical Planning and Inference,2007,137 (11 ) :3416-3429.
  • 5Often W, Chuang-Stein C, Dmitrienko A, et al. Multiple co-primary endpoints:medical and statistical solutions a report from the multiple endpoints expert team of the pharmaceutical research and manufacturers of america. Drug Information Journal,2007,41:31-46.
  • 6Leon AC, Heo M, Teres JJ, et al. Statistical power of multiplicity adjust- ment strategies for correlated binary endpoints. Star Med ,2007,26 (8) : 1712-1723.
  • 7Leon AC ,Heo M. A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints. J Biopharm Stat,2005,15 (5) :839-855.
  • 8U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Ad-ministration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Bio- logics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry : E9 Statistical Principles, 1998.
  • 9Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT state- ment for reporting randomized trials:explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med,2001,134(8) :663-694.
  • 10Koch GG,Gansky SA. Statistical considerations for multiplicity in con- firmatory protocols. Drug Information Journal, 1996,33 : 523-533.

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部