期刊文献+

盐酸羟考酮或吗啡静脉自控镇痛泵联合超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在胃肠肿瘤根治术后的镇痛效果 被引量:5

Analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia oxycodone hydrochloride or morphine combined with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms after radical resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨盐酸羟考酮或吗啡静脉自控镇痛泵(PCIA)联合超声引导下腹横机平面阻滞(TAP)在胃肠肿瘤根治术后的镇痛效果。方法选取2016年1月至2017年1月间上海闵行区中心医院收治的120例行胃肠肿瘤根治术患者,采用随机数表法分为A、B、C三组,每组40例。A组患者采用彩超引导下双侧TAP阻滞联合盐酸羟考酮PCIA治疗,B组患者采用彩超引导下双侧TAP阻滞联合吗啡PCIA治疗,C组患者采用彩超引导下双侧TAP阻滞联合生理盐水(安慰剂) PCIA治疗。观察三组患者术后2h、6h、12h、24h和48h静息和咳嗽状态下的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术中舒芬太尼用量、术后24h补救镇痛率、48h静脉自控镇痛泵(PCIA)有效按压次数及用药不良反应。结果 A组患者2h、6h、12h、24h和48h静息和咳嗽状态下VAS评分均低于B组和C组,且B组患者不同状态下不同时间点与C组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P <0. 05)。三组患者术中舒芬太尼用量比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。C组患者24h补救镇痛率均高于A组和B组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05),A组低于B组,但差异无统计学意义。C组患者48h PCIA有效按压次数均少于A组和B组,且A组少于B组,差异均有统计学意义(均P <0. 05)。三组患者用药不良反应比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P> 0. 05)。A组患者恶心呕吐发生率高于C组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论超声引导下双侧TAP阻滞联合盐酸羟考酮PCIA应用于胃肠肿瘤根治术后患者镇痛效果确切,且无明显用药不良反应。 Objective To observe the analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia( PCIA) oxycodone hydrochloride or morphine combined with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane( TAP) block in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms after radical resection. Methods From January 2016 to January 2017,120 patients undergoing radical resection for gastrointestinal tumors at Shanghai Minhang District Central Hospital were selected and divided into three groups according to random digital table with 40 patients in each group. Group A was treated with bilateral TAP block combined with PCIA oxycodone hydrochloride guided by color Doppler ultrasound. Group B was treated with bilateral TAP block combined with PCIA morphine guided by color Doppler ultrasound. Group C was treated with bilateral TAP block combined with PCIA saline( placebo) guided by color Doppler ultrasound. The visual analogue score( VAS) was observed at 2,6,12,24 and 48 h after the operation,and under cough state was observed. The dosage of sufentanil,the rate of relief analgesia at 24 h after operation,the effective times of PCIA pressing and the adverse drug reactions at 48 h after operation were also observed. Results The VAS scores at 2,6,12,24 and 48 h after the operation and under cough state were lower in group A than in group B and group C. There was significantly difference in VAS scores between group B and group C at different time points( all P < 0. 05). There was no statistically significant difference in the he dosage of sufentanil,among the three groups( P > 0. 05). The rate of relief analgesia at 24 h after operation was higher in group C than in group A and group B( all P < 0. 05). Although the rate of relief analgesia at 24 h after operation was lower in group A than in group B,the difference was not statistically significant( P > 0. 05). The number of effective times of PCIA pressing at 48 h after operation was significantly less in group C than in group A and group B with group A less than group B( all P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions among the three groups( P > 0. 05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in group A is higher than that in group C( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block combined with oxycodone hydrochloride PCIA was effective in postoperative analgesia of gastrointestinal neoplasms,and there was no obvious adverse drug reaction.
作者 孙慧娟 蔡水峰 沈丹杰 SUN Hui-juan;CAI Shui-feng;SHEN Dan-jie(Department of Anesthesiology,Shanghai Minhang District Central Hospital,Shanghai 201100,China;Department of Gastroenterology,Shanghai Minhang District Central Hospital,Shanghai 201100,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2019年第2期198-201,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 盐酸羟考酮 吗啡 静脉自控镇痛泵 超声 腹横肌平面阻滞 胃肠肿瘤根治术 镇痛效果 Oxycodone hydrochloride Morphine Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia Ultrasound Transversus abdominis plane block Radical resection for gastrointestinal tumors Analgesic efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献69

  • 1徐瀚峰,郑勤,张全安,王礼学,丁婕.盐酸羟考酮控释片不同给药方式治疗中重度癌性疼痛的疗效比较[J].实用癌症杂志,2010,25(5):533-534. 被引量:22
  • 2马玉荣.盐酸羟考酮缓释片治疗晚期癌症疼痛的临床观察[J].云南医药,2013,34(1):37-38. 被引量:7
  • 3Gildasio S De Oliveira Jr,Paul Fitzgerald,Shireen Ahmad,John Kim,Rohit Rahangdale,Robert McCarthy.Transversus abdominis plane infiltration for laparoscopic gastric banding: A pilot study[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2014,6(2):27-32. 被引量:4
  • 4Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, et al. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean de- livery[ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 2009, 103 (5) : 726 - 730.
  • 5Lenz H, Sandvik L, Qvigstad E, et al. A comparison of intrave- nous oxycodone and intravenous morphine in patient - controlled postoperative analgesia after l aparoscopic hysterectomy [ J ]. Anesth Anal, 2009, 109(4) : 1279 - 1283.
  • 6Elvir-Lazo ,White PF. The role of multimodal analgesiain pain management after ambulatory surgery.Curr Opin An-aesthesiol,2010, 23 (6) : 697-703.
  • 7Wills VL,Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.BrJ Surg, 2000, 87(3); 273-284.
  • 8El-Dawlatly AA,Turkistani A, Kettner SC, et al. Ultra-sound-guided transversusabdominis plane block: descriptionof a new technique and comparison with conventionalsystemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br JAnaesth, 2009,102(6): 763-767.
  • 9Keir A,Rhodes L,Kayal A, et al. Does a transversusabdo-minis plane (TAP) local anaesthetic block improve pain con-trol in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Abest evidence topic.Int J Surg, 2013,11 ?9) : 792-794.
  • 10Wang X,Wang K,Wang B, et al. Effect of oxycodone com-bined with dexmedetomidine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after video-asvsisted thoracoscopic lobec-tomy. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth, 2016, 30(4) : 1015-1021.

共引文献98

同被引文献106

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部