期刊文献+

宋代词论辨疑四则

Four Queries on Ci Commentaries of the Song Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学术界历来认为,宋代词论中苏轼鄙视柳永,而李清照又不满苏轼。事实上,苏轼对柳永的态度比较辩证,李清照的词“别是一家”与苏轼“以诗为词”的理论,具备内在精神的一致性。张炎《词源》提出“清空”概念,众多学者推许它是清雅人格的象征,细经辨析,则应属于词法范畴的规则。 The academia has long claimed that in ci commentaries of the Song Dynasty, Su Shi feels a contempt for Liu Yong, while Li Qingzhao does not think much of Su Shi. But in fact, Su s attitude towards Liu is of a comparatively dialectical one. There also exists a sort of internal uniformity between Li Qingzhao s ' unique style of ci poetry and Su's theory on 'making use of poetry in ci composition.' Zhang Yan' s Origin of Ci Poetry puts forward the concept of 'pure and void,' of which not a few scholars conjecture it to be a symbol of his detached and elegant disposition. Yet careful examination and analysis tell us that it should belong in the category of skills in ci writing.
作者 高峰
出处 《南京师范大学文学院学报》 2003年第3期65-68,共4页 Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
关键词 宋朝 词论 苏轼 柳永 李清照 清空 Su Shi, Li Qingzhao, pure and void
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部