环保督政约谈机制分析:以安阳市为例

Implication of Administrative Talk to Environmental Supervision in China: a Case Study of Anyang City

环保督政约谈制度是环保新常态下的一项制度尝试。本文以安阳市作为案例点,从约谈的法律依据、整改措施等方面对环保督政约谈制度进行了研究。研究发现环保督政约谈制度有一定的法律基础,在国外和国内许多行业也有类似的实践,实施该制度以来已取得一定成效,但也存在部分措施行政色彩较重、长效机制缺乏、环境问题责任界定不清等问题。文章提出了要明确政府部门职责,提高环保执法能力并建立"尽责免责"机制,要创新约谈模式,试行"党政同责"和"部门问责",强化整改措施落实,加大信息公开并加强监督和跟踪评估,逐步建立环保"阳光"约谈的长效机制等建议。

Environmental Supervision Talk is a system try under the new normal environmental protection. Taking An yang city as a case, this paper conducted the research on the environmental supervision talk from the aspects such as legal basis, required measures and procedures. We found that the environmental supervision talk has a certain legal foundation and some similar practical experience both in domestic and abroad. Since the beginning of the environmental supervision talk, cities that were talked by MEP have achieved some positive progress. However, problems that mainly including the command & control feature of the administrative measures, the lack of long-run mechanism and unclear list of environmental responsibility etc. are still exist. This paper proposed that it's urgent to make clear allocation of the environmental responsibilities of each government departments, improve capacity of the law enforcement supervision, establish the 'duty exemption' if governmental staff are dutiful. Meanwhile, innovate the existing environmental supervision talk mode, try to let the administration head and party head to share the same duty for environmental protection, strengthen the implementation of various measures, enlarge information disclosure and enforce supervision and tracking assessment, a long-term transparent mechanism for environmental supervision talk should be gradually established.