期刊文献+

观察心理护理在无痛人流麻醉护理中应用的效果 被引量:4

Effect Observation of Psychological Nursing in Painless Artificial Abortion Anesthesia Nursing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察与探究心理护理在无痛人流麻醉护理中应用的效果。方法选取我院在2014年3月-2017年3月收治的70例无痛人流患者作为观察目标,按照随机偶数奇数法分为对照组(n=35)和观察组(n=35)两组,分别予以常规麻醉护理和心理护理,观察并比较两组护理效果的差异。结果观察组患者的麻醉药物使用剂量、术后苏醒时间分别为(11.02±2.01)mg/m L、(3.03±0.50)min,与对照组患者的(15.30±2.50)mg/m L、(6.05±0.80)min相对比,组间差异比较明显(P<0.05),观察组患者的Ⅰ级不良情绪例数、Ⅱ级不良情绪例数、Ⅲ级不良情绪例数(30例、4例、1例)与对照组患者(5例、20例、10例)相对比,组间差异比较明显(P<0.05),观察组患者的护理满意度(97.14%)显著高于对照组患者(80.00%),经统计比较,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在无痛人流麻醉护理中增加心理护理的效果较好。 Objective To observe and explore application effect of psychological nursing in painless artificial abortion anesthesia nursing. Methods Choose 70 cases patients received painless artificial abortion from March, 2014 to March, 2017 in our hospital as research objects, divide them into two groups with random digital table method, 35 case in each. Control group was treated with routine anesthesia nursing, and observation group with psychological nursing based on routine anesthesia. Compare and analyze effect of two groups. Results Anesthetic dosage and postoperative recovery time was(11.02±2.01)mg/m L,(3.03±0.50) min in observation group, and that of control group was(15.30±2.50)mg/m L,(6.05±0.80)min,difference between groups was significant(P<0.05). Grade I, II, III bad mood cases of observation group(30 cases, 4 cases, 1 cases) showed significant difference from those of control group(5 cases, 20 cases, 10 cases),P<0.05. Satisfaction degree of observation group(97.14%) showed significant difference from that of control group(80.00%),P<0.05. Conclusion Adding psychological nursing has good effect on painless abortion anesthesia nursing.
作者 杨小容
出处 《智慧健康》 2017年第12期29-31,共3页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 心理护理 无痛人流 麻醉护理 效果 psychological care painless abortion anesthesia care effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

共引文献26

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部