期刊文献+

分析安眠药中毒患者急诊滞留时间的影响因素 被引量:1

Influencing Factors Analysis of Emergency Detention Time of Hypnotic Poisoning Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对影响安眠药中毒患者急诊滞留时间进行观察分析。方法选取我院2016年3月至2017年2月的安眠药中毒患者的60例临床资料进行分组调查,将60例患者分为观察组与参照组各30例,将两组患者急诊滞留时间作为因变量,对急诊室的性别年龄、救治时间、昏迷时间等指标进行分析对比。结果根据本研究结果显示,观察组年龄低于参照组,服药药物剂量较参照组少,改良早期预警体系评分高于参照组,昏迷评分优于参照组。观察组轻度昏迷27例,中度昏迷2例,重度昏迷1例较之参照组轻度昏迷7例,中度昏迷15例,重度昏迷8例,观察组明显优于参照组。两组患者差异对比有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论影响安眠药中毒患者急诊滞留的因素有年龄、救治时间、昏迷评分情况等,初始救治时间若超过1 h以外、昏迷指数较高将成为影响安眠药中毒患者急诊滞留时间的重要因素。 Objective To observe and analyze retention time of emergency hypnotic poisoning patients. MethodsChoose 60 cases hypnotic poisoning patients treated in our hospital from March 2016 to February 2017, investigate their clinical data, and divide them into observation and control group randomly, 30 cases in each. Analyze and compare sex, age, rescue time and coma time and other indicators in emergency room with dependent variable of emergency residence time of two groups. Results The study showed, age of observation group was lower than control group, medication dosage was less than control group, modified early warning system scores were higher than control group, and coma scores were better than control group. In obseration group, there were 27 cases mild coma, 2 cases moderate coma, 1 case severe coma, and in control group, there were 7 cases mild coma, 15 cases moderate coma, 8 cases severe coma, data of observation group was significantly better than control group, difference showed statistical significance between two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion Influencing factors of emergency detention of hypnotic poisoning patients include age, rescue time, coma scores and etc. And initial resuce time exceeding 1 h and high coma index is important influencing factor of emergency detention time of hypnotic poisoning patients.
作者 王春宝
出处 《智慧健康》 2017年第21期91-93,共3页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 安眠药中毒患者 急诊滞留时间 影响因素分析 Hypnotic poisoning patients Emergency detention time Influencing factors analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1李治玖,孙刚,孙能军,李春鹏,杨正红,张丽.血浆置换术治疗急性重度安眠药中毒32例临床观察[J].滨州医学院学报,1994,17(1):52-53. 被引量:2
  • 2杜军,冯树行,白路.急诊科滞留时间超过4h以上患者的临床分析[J].世界急危重病医学杂志,2005,2(4):805-807. 被引量:10
  • 3李海,杨莉.儿童中毒影响因素分析及其干预的研究进展[J].疾病控制杂志,2006,10(1):72-75. 被引量:35
  • 4陈晓荣,陈海燕,李志红,袁晓敏,王俊林.急诊护理流程及时效的研究[J].护士进修杂志,2007,22(17):1567-1569. 被引量:14
  • 5Ding R, Mccarthy ML, Desmond JS, et al. Characterizing Waitk ing Room Time,Treatment Time,and Boarding Time in the E- mergency Department Using Quantile Regression[J]. Acad Emerg Med,2010,17(8):813-823.
  • 6Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. ACEM polly on standard terminology. 2009. [2011-06-01] http://wwww. acem. org. au/media/policies and guidelines/PO2 Standard- Teminology 16.04.09. pdf.
  • 7Hennerman PL, Nathanson BH Li H , et al. Emergency depart- ment patients who stay more than6 hours contribute to cro- wing[J].J EmergMed ,2010,39(1):105-112.
  • 8仕军,冯树行,白路.急诊科滞留时间超过4h以上患者的临床分析[J].世界危重病医学杂志.2005,2(4):805-806.
  • 9Denaro CP . Access block:it's all about available beds [J]. Med J Aust ,2009,191(5) :292.
  • 10Nocera A. Access block can be managed [J]. Med J Aust , 2009,191 (5) : 292-293.

共引文献36

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部