手术治疗与保守治疗胃溃疡的临床疗效对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effect between Surgical Treatment and Conservative Treatment of Gastric Ulcer

目的探究手术治疗和保守治疗对于胃溃疡的临床疗效。方法选取100例胃溃疡患者的病历进行回顾性分析,随机分为对照组和观察组。观察组进行手术治疗,对照组采用保守治疗。观察两组患者接受胃溃疡治疗的疗效、并发症发病率以及胃溃疡复发率。结果观察组治疗有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);且并发症(如胃穿孔、梗阻、胃出血等)的发病率相较于对照组较低(P<0.05);术后观察组在半年和一年时的复发率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对于胃溃疡的治疗,采用外科手术相较于保守治疗具有较好的疗效,且并发症较少,复发率低。是一种较为理想的治疗方案。

Objective to explore clinical effect of surgical treatment and conservative treatment for gastric ulcer. Methods choose 100 cases gastric ulcer patients, review and analyze their medical records. Divide them into control group and observation group randomly. Observation group was treated with surgical treatment, and control group with conservative treatment. Observe curative effect, complications incidence and recurrence rate of gastric ulcer between two groups. Results effective rate of observation group was higher than control group(P<0.05), and complications incidence(such as gastric perforation, obstruction, gastric hemorrhage, etc.) was lower than control group(P<0.05);recurrence rate of observation group half a year and one year after operation was lower than control group(P<0.05). Conclusion surgical treatment has better effect than conservative treatment for gastric ulcer, with fewer complications and lower recurrence rate, which is an ideal treatment scheme.