期刊文献+

腹腔镜再次胆道手术治疗胆总管结石的疗效及安全性分析 被引量:1

Efficacy and Safety Of Laparoscopic Biliary Tract Surgery for Common Bile Duct Stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析胆总管结石患者再次进行腹腔镜胆道手术的临床效果。方法将48例胆总管结石患者分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组实施腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组实施开腹手术治疗,比较两组患者的各项治疗指标。结果治疗组手术时间、出血量、副作用发生率低于对照组,同时,治疗组消化系统的恢复速度及住院时间都优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论为再次进行手术治疗的胆总管结石的患者实施腹腔镜胆道手术可以减少患者手术过程中的出血量,降低治疗时间,有利于患者的康复和提高患者的生活质量,值得推广。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery in patients with common bile duct stones. Methods 48 patients with common bile duct stones were divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment group was treated with laparoscopic surgery, and the control group was treated with open surgery. The treatment indexes of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time, bleeding volume and side effect rate of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group. At the same time, the recovery rate and hospitalization time of the digestive system in the treatment group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic biliary tract surgery for patients with common bile duct stones can reduce the amount of bleeding during surgery and reduce the treatment time, which is conducive to the rehabilitation of patients and improve the quality of life of patients. It is worth promoting.
作者 陈明亮 朱宇 CHEN Ming-liang;ZHU Yu(Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Suining Central Hospital,Suining,Sichuan,629000)
出处 《智慧健康》 2019年第6期152-153,156,共3页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 腹腔镜再次胆道手术 胆总管结石 疗效 安全性 Laparoscopic biliary tract surgery Common bile duct stones Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献63

  • 1龚连生,张阳德,刘恕,何剪太.胆道术后腹腔镜再次手术[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(10):1-3. 被引量:35
  • 2黄志强.胆道再次手术中的肝门部胆管显露问题[J].肝胆外科杂志,2005,13(5):321-322. 被引量:27
  • 3李旋,林德新,林枫,叶启文,李林立.胆道再次手术中十二指肠损伤的治疗[J].肝胆外科杂志,2006,14(6):446-447. 被引量:4
  • 4Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(2):191-208.
  • 5Dawe SR, Windsor JA, Broeders JA, et al. A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(2): 236-248.
  • 6Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, et al. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2007, 66(6):1154-1160.
  • 7Zhou Y, Wu XD, Fan RG, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure of choledochotomy after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy[J]. Int J Surg, 2014, 12(7):645-648.
  • 8Guda NM, Reddy DN, Kumar A. Complications of ERCP[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2014, 33(1):1-9.
  • 9Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 18:196-204.
  • 10migielski JA, Piskorz ?, Koptas W. Comparison of treatment costs of laparoscopic and open surgery[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2015, 10(3):437-441.

共引文献57

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部