期刊文献+

微创拔牙技术拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿的临床疗效 被引量:5

Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Extraction Technology in Removing Impacted Lower Mandibular Wisdom Teeth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究微创拔牙技术拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿的临床疗效及其效果分析。方法从2018年1月至2018年12月在我院口腔科确诊并进行拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿治疗的患者中选取1000例作为研究对象,按照患者采取的治疗技术分为对照组和实验组,对照组患者采用传统的凿骨劈冠法进行治疗,实验组的患者则采用微创拔牙技术进行治疗,每组各500例,对患者的手术时间、术后疼痛、术后肿胀及术后并发症进行比较。结果通过数据对比,实验组的手术时间为(16.3±4.3)min,对照组的为(39.4±10.2)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);同时术后疼痛、术后肿胀以及术后并发症之间的比较,实验组明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论微创拔牙技术能够减少拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿的时间,减轻术后的疼痛、肿胀、并发症等,具有更好的临床效果。 Objective The analysis and research of the clinical effect of minimally invasive extraction of impacted lower mandibular wisdom teeth.Methods One thousand patients with impacted mandibular lower impacted wisdom teeth in our hospital were selected from January 2018 to December 2018.Patients were divided into control group and experimental group which according to the treatment techniques.Patients in control group were treated with traditional chisel and crown splitting method,while patients in experimental group were treated with minimally invasive extraction technique,each group had 500 people.The operative time,postoperative pain and complications after operation were compared.Results By comparing the data,the operation time of the experimental group was(16.3±4.3)minutes,and that of the control group was(39.4±10.2)minutes.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At the same time,the comparison of pain,swelling and complications after operation in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive extraction technology can reduce the time of extraction of impacted lower mandibular wisdom teeth,relieve pain,swelling,complications and so on.It has better clinical effect.
作者 韦玉洁 WEI Yu-jie(The People's Hospital of Du’an Yao Autonomous County,Hechi,Guangxi 530700)
出处 《智慧健康》 2019年第10期47-49,共3页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 微创拔牙技术 下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿 临床疗效 Minimally invasive extraction technique Mandibular impacted wisdom teeth Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献57

  • 1李行健,王进.微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(3):181-182. 被引量:23
  • 2苏波,张惠兰.即刻种植义齿[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2004,2(4):240-242. 被引量:8
  • 3翁素清,张贺志.对羧基苄胺明胶海绵预防下颌阻生智齿拔除术后干槽症[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1996,14(3):241-241. 被引量:6
  • 4张雪洋,胡飞,朱安棣,余燕玲.Luxator微创拔牙刀的临床研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(2):20-22. 被引量:22
  • 5Hansson P,Ekblom A,Thomsson M,et al.Pain development and consumption of analgesics after oral surgery in relation to personality characteristics[J].Pain,1989,37 (3):271-277.
  • 6Benediktsd6ttir IS,Wenzel A,Petersen JK,et al.Mandibular third molar removal:Risk indicators for extended operation time,postoperative pain,and complications[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2004,97 (4):438-446.
  • 7Gbotolorun OM,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde AL.Assessment of (actors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65 (10):1977-1983.
  • 8Noroozi AR,Philbert RF.Modern concepts in understanding and management of the "dry socket" syndrome:Comprehensive review of the literature[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2009,107(1):30-35.
  • 9Diniz-Freitas M,Lago-Mendez L,Gude-Sampedro F,et al.Ped-erson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,45 (1):23-26.
  • 10Graziani F,D'Aiuto F,Arduino PG,et al.Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal.A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2006,35 (3):241-246.

共引文献253

同被引文献34

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部