Force Triad能量平台辅助腮腺区域性切除术的临床研究

Controlled clinical study of force triad energy platform in partial parotidectomy

目的:评价ForceTriad能量平台在腮腺区域性切除术中的临床价值。方法:选取需行腮腺区域性切除术患者30例,随机分为2组,每组各15例,其中实验组术中使用Force Triad能量平台系统,对照组选择高频电刀传统方法。将两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、引流天数、住院时间、住院费用以及手术并发症进行比较。结果:实验组的手术时间、术后引流量、引流天数、住院时间均小于对照组(P<0. 05);住院费用高于对照组(P<0. 05);术中出血量无显著差异(P> 0. 05);手术并发症方面,面神经麻痹:实验组有2例(13. 33%)、对照组有3例(20%),涎漏:实验组有1例(6. 67%),对照组有2例(13. 33%),两组的手术并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论:腮腺区域性切除术使用Force Triad能量平台系统,缩短了手术时间、减少了术后引流量、缩短了住院时间。

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Force Triad energy platform used in partial parotidectomy.Methods:30 patients underwent partial parotidectomy in our hospital and were randomly allocated to 2 groups:15 using Force Triad energy platform(experimental group),and 15 using the conventional method(control group).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage,drainage days,length of stay,hospital costs and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.%Results:The operative time,postoperative drainage,drainage days,length of stay of experimental group were lower than those of control group,with significant statistical difference(P<0.05).The hospital cost was higher in experimental group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups’intraoperative blood loss(P>0.05).In the term of postoperative complications,13.33%of experimental group suffered facial weakness immediately postoperatively versus 20%of control group,while 6.67%of experimental group suffered parotid gland leakage versus 13.33%of control group.The rates of complications were no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Compared with traditional surgery,Force Triad energy platform provides significant advantages in partial parotidectomy,with a shorter operative time,less drainage and drainage days,shorter hospital stay and other effects.