3Amdt Guentsch, Philip M. Preshaw. The use of a linear oseillafiong device in periodontal treatment: a review. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35 : 514 - 524.
4Braun A, Krause F, Hartschen V, et al. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector system ciompared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Periodontol, 2006, 33:568-514.
5Kahl M, Ha,ase E, Kocher T, et al. Clinical effects after subgingival polishing with a non - aggressive ultrasonic device in initial therapy. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34: 318- 324.
6Kocher T, Fanghanel J, Schwahn C, et al. A new Ultrasonic device in Maintenance therapy :perception of pain and clinical efficacy. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32:425-429.
7Rupf S, Brader I, Vondeflind D, et al. In vitro, clinical, and microbiological evaluation of linear oscillating device for sealing and root planning. Journal of Pefiodontology, 76,1942-1949.
8Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, et al. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic sealers and a hand scaler in vivo. Journal of Periodontal Research, 42, 90 -95.
9Hoffman A, Marshall R, Bartold P. Use of Vector .scaling unit in supportive periodontal therapy: a subjective patient evaluation. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32: 1089-1093.
10Andreas B, Felix Krause, Matthias Frentzen, et al. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector system compared to ultrasonic sealing and hand instrumentation in vitro. J pefiodont Rcs, 2005, 40 -48 -52.
