期刊文献+

共享经济的监管:一个分析框架——以共享单车为例 被引量:13

Towards A Theoretical Framework of Regulation for Shared Economy:A Case Study of Shared Bicycle
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以共享单车为例,基于无序与强制的分析框架,本文从合作监管的视角梳理我国共享经济监管的政策和实践,分析共享经济监管的类型、动态演进过程和最优监管的实现方式。共享经济存在着单独监管、少数主体合作监管、多数主体合作监管和超级综合监管四种类型,总体上,监管趋向最优,然而,受到技术的短期效应、法治化程度与民众素养的约束,最优监管往往难以实现。在理想状态下,平台监管及其长期形成的平台生态是最优监管可能的实现方式之一,它为共享经济的持续健康发展提供了重要的参考和借鉴。 In the framework of coercion and disorder,the paper combines the policy and implementation of sharing economy regulation promulgated by multiple cities in China from the perspective of collaborative regulation,and analyzes the types of shared economy regulation,the dynamic evolution process,and the implementation of optimal regulation.It concluded that there were four types of regulation for shared economy:individual regulation,collaborative regulation by a few entities,collaborative regulation by most subjects,and super comprehensive supervision.In general,regulation of shared economy tends to be optimal.However,under restrictions of technology,the degree of legalization,and the quality of the public,optimal supervision was often difficult to achieve in practice.In an ideal state,platform governance and its ecosystem is one of the possible ways to lead to optimal regulation.The collaborative regulation of shared bicycles provides an important reference and experience for the development of the shared economy.
作者 张丙宣 华逸婕 Zhang Bingxuan;Hua Yijie(School of Public Administration,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期4-13,155,共11页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"新型政商关系研究"(编号:17JZD008) 国家社科基金青年项目"城郊结合部社会管理成本的生成与控制机制研究"(编号:14CZZ039)的阶段性成果
关键词 共享经济 共享单车 合作监管 最优监管 平台治理 shared economy shared bicycles collaborative regulation optimal regulation platform governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献125

  • 1周雪光.“逆向软预算约束”:一个政府行为的组织分析[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):132-143. 被引量:581
  • 2周汉华.行政许可法:观念创新与实践挑战[J].法学研究,2005,27(2):3-24. 被引量:109
  • 3Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量:255
  • 4Agency, S. F. (2014), "Taxis and accessible services division: Status of taxi industry", http://www, sfmta, com.
  • 5Airbnb (2014), "Airbnb economic impact", http://blog. airbnb, com.
  • 6Bardhi, E & G. M. Eckhardt(2012) ,"Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing", Journal of Consumer Research 39 (4) :881--898.
  • 7Belk, R. (2007),"Why not share rather than own", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sci ence 611(1) :126--140.
  • 8Belk, R. (2010) ,"Sharing", Journal of Consumer Research 37(5) :715--734.
  • 9Belk, R. (2014),"You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online", Journal of Business Research 67(8) : 1595-- 1600.
  • 10Benkler, Y. (2004), "Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production", Yale Law Journal 114(2):273-- 358.

共引文献841

同被引文献163

引证文献13

二级引证文献200

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部