期刊文献+

自主性是否存在——“神经X学”时代的挑战 被引量:1

Does Autonomy Exist in the “Neural X” Era?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在日常的意识体验中,人们将自主性、自由意志当作理所当然的事情欣然接受,也顺理成章地在其基础上建立起庞大的道德法律体系,以之规约社会生活。然而,伴随近年来"新自然主义"的强势崛起,以神经伦理学、神经经济学、神经美学、神经法学等为代表的"神经X学"正蓬勃发展,神经科学家、脑科学家等开展的一系列实验研究对自主性与自由意志是否真的存在这一哲学问题提出了严肃质疑。倘若神经X学在技术上进一步实现质的突破,作为个体自主性的基础的自由意志最终被否定,那么,这将对整个人类文明造成巨大的冲击,使人类社会的道德、法律、伦理体系以及个人的人生观、价值观、世界观发生不可预测的重大变革。 In the daily experience,people accept autonomy and free will as a matter of course to establish a huge moral and legal system on the basis of which to regulate social life.However,with the strong rise of'new naturalism'in recent years,'Neuro X'discipline represented by neuroethics,neuroeconomics,neuro-aesthetics,neurological law,etc.is booming,many neuroscientists and brain scientists are developing a series of experimental studies to raise a serious philosophical question of whether autonomy and free will exist.If Neuro X further achieves a qualitative breakthrough in technology,and the free will as the basis of individual autonomy is finally denied,the entire human civilization would be tremendously impacted,as well as there would be unpredictable changes in personal outlook on life,values,and world.
作者 王晓梅 何丽 Wang Xiaomei;He Li(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310028)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期100-104,158-159,共6页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(15ZDB015) 2019年浙江大学中央高校基本科研业务费马克思主义学院青年科研创新发展专项项目
关键词 神经X学 自主性 自由意志 法律 Neuro X autonomy free will law
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1Anne, D. , 2000, "Autonomy and interdependence : quandaries in genetic decision making", in C. MacKenzie and N. Stoljar ~ eds. ), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Benson, P. , 1991, "Autonomy and oppressive socialization", in Social Theory and Practice 17 ( 3 ).
  • 3Christman, J. , 2004, "Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves", in Philosophical Studies 117.
  • 4Dworkin, R. 1976, "Autonomy and behavior control", in The Hastings Center Report 6 ( 1 ).
  • 5Dworkin, R.1988, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Ekstrom, L , 1993, "A coherence theory of autonomy", in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53.
  • 7Ekstrom, L ,2005, "Autonomy and personal integration", in J. S. Taylor ( ed. ) , Personal Autonomy, New essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Frankfurt, G. , 1971, "Freedom of the will and the concept of a person", in The Journal of Philosophy 68 ( 1 ).
  • 9Friedman, M., 2003, Autonomy, Gender, Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Gilligan, C. , 1993, In a Different Voice : Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press.

共引文献14

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部