期刊文献+

符号学视域中的博弈“聚点”分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Game-Theoretical “Focal Point”: A Perspective of Semiotics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在部分多重纳什均衡博弈问题中,通过数理推演有时无法确定纳什均衡解,托马斯·谢林提出的"聚点"理论致力于解决此类问题。博弈通常需要借助符号进行,从认知主体和情景等多个维度对博弈符号的意义和类型进行具体分析,围绕"聚点"的形成与凸显等方面来解读和描述其相关特征,不但有望拓展和深化"聚点"理论,而且有助于提高人们在认知和交际层面的符号博弈能力。 In the partial multiple Nash equilibrium game,the Nash equilibrium solution cannot always be found through mathematical deduction.Thomas C.Schelling proposed'Focal Point'theory and tried to solve such problems.Game is usually represented with symbols.Players analyze the meaning and type of symbols from multiple dimensions such as cognitive subjects and cognitive background,and try to understand the features of the'Focal Point'.Through this study we expect to improve the efficiency of finding the'Focal Point',and help to enhance people’s symbolic game ability at the cognitive and communication level.
作者 黄华新 马继伟 Huang Huaxin;Ma Jiwei(Center for the Study of Language and Cognition,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310028)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期105-110,159,共7页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"汉语隐喻的逻辑表征与认知计算(18ZDA290)"的阶段性研究成果
关键词 符号博弈 符号三角 符号类型 聚点 认知 symbolic game semiotic triangle types of semiotic focal point cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1巴尔特 罗兰 王东亮 译.《符号学原理》[M].三联书店,1999年..
  • 2索绪尔.《普通语言学教程》,第50-51页,高名凯译,商务印书馆,2002年版.
  • 3塔尔斯基.1998年.《语义性真理概念和语义学的基础》,载马蒂尼奇编.《语言哲学》,商务印书馆.
  • 4Peirce, C. S. Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs. In Innis, R. E. (ed.) , Semiotics: An Introducto ry Anthology. Indiana University Press, 1985, p. 5.
  • 5Chandler, D. Semiotics: the Basics. Routledge, 2007, p. 31, pp. 32--33.
  • 6亚里士多德.《诗学》,商务印书馆2005年版,第149页.
  • 7Richards, I. A. (1936) The Philosophy of Rheto- ric. Routledge, 2001, p. 80.
  • 8Lakoff, G. The contemporary theory of meta phor. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought.Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 203, p. 245.
  • 9Lakoff, G.& Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live by, University of Chicago Press, 1980, p. 22.
  • 10Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Prag- matics, 1999(31), pp. 1542--1543.

共引文献7

同被引文献2

引证文献2

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部