趋避道德动机量表在中国大学生中的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of Model of Moral Motives Scale in Chinese College Students

目的:检验趋避道德动机量表(Model of Moral Motives Scale)在中国大学生群体中的信度和效度。方法:采用中文版趋避道德动机量表、道德基础问卷、亲社会倾向量表对650名大学生进行施测,两周后对其中的200名大学生进行重测。结果:①验证性因素分析发现,趋避道德动机量表的六因素模型拟合良好,说明该量表具有良好的结构效度。②效标关联效度分析发现,趋避道德动机量表中的他人禁止与道德基础问卷中的伤害/关爱有显著正相关,群体禁止与权威/颠覆和纯洁/堕落显著正相关。另外,亲社会行为与自我禁止、他人禁止呈显著负相关,与他人规范、群体规范和群体禁止呈显著正相关。这些结果与趋避道德动机理论假设基本一致。③趋避道德动机总量表的内部一致性系数为0.894,分量表内部一致性系数除社会秩序为0.466外,其余在0.601-0.739之间;2周后重测信度在0.517-0.666之间。结论:中文版趋避道德动机量表具有良好的信度和效度,适用于大学生群体。

Objective:This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Model of Moral Motives(MMM)Scale in Chinese College Students.Methods:We recruited 650 Chinese college students to complete a battery which consisted of the MMM Scale,Moral Foundations Questionnaire and Prosocial Tendencies Measure.After 2 weeks,200 randomly sampled subjects were retested.Results:①Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the six-factor model of the MMM scale provided a good fit with the data.②We found that Other-protect was positively correlated with Harm/Care of Haidt’s moral foundations.Group-protect was positively correlated with Authority/Respect and Purity/Sanctity.Moreover,prosocial behaviors were positively correlated with Other-provide,Group-provide,and Group-protect,but negatively correlated with Selfprotect and Other-protect.③The internal consistency coefficients of the MMM scale and its subscales ranged from 0.446 to 0.894,and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.517 to 0.666.Conclusion:The Chinese version of MMM scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the moral motives in Chinese college students.