期刊文献+

原发性乳腺癌分子分型与新辅助化疗疗效及预后的相关性 被引量:12

Relationship of Molecular Subtypes with Responses and Outcome of Primary Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨原发性乳腺癌分子分型与新辅助化疗疗效及预后之间的相关性。方法回顾性分析河南省肿瘤医院收治的204例接受新辅助化疗患者的临床病理资料,分为Luminal A、Luminal B、HER2阳性和三阴乳腺癌4种亚型,分析乳腺癌分子分型对新辅助化疗疗效及预后的预测作用。结果 204例患者中,40例(19.6%)为Luminal A亚型,46例(22.5%)为Luminal B亚型,36例(17.6%)为HER2阳性亚型,82例(40.2%)为三阴乳腺癌亚型。HER2阳性(22.2%)及三阴乳腺癌亚型(22.4%)的病理完全缓解(p CR)率明显高于Luminal A亚型(2.5%)及Luminal B亚型(6.5%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。与Luminal亚型相比,HER2阳性及三阴乳腺癌亚型具有更差的无病生存期(DFS)(P=0.001)和OS(P=0.002);剔除获得p CR的患者,单独评价存在肿瘤残留的患者,我们发现HER2阳性及三阴乳腺癌亚型比Luminal亚型具有更差的DFS(P<0.001)和OS(P<0.001)。获得p CR的乳腺癌患者的5年DFS和总生存期(OS)均明显高于化疗后仍有癌残留的患者(P=0.002,P=0.012)。结论相对于Luminal亚型,HER2阳性和三阴乳腺癌亚型对新辅助化疗更为敏感,更易达到p CR;但是HER2阳性和三阴乳腺癌亚型预后反而更差。 Objective To explore the relationship of molecular subtypes with the responses and outcome of primary breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We included 204 patients with primary breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in He'nan Tumor Hospital in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into 4 subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 positive and triple-negative. The predictive role of molecular subtype in the response and outcome of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed. Results Among all 204 patients, 40(19.6%) patients were Luminal A subtype, 46(22.5%) were Luminal B subtype, 36(17.6%) were HER2 positive subtype and 82(40.2%) were triple-negative subtype. The p CR rates of HER2 positive(22.2%) and triplenegative(24.4%) subtypes were higher than those of Luminal A(2.5%) and Luminal B(6.5%), with significant difference(P=0.03). Despite initial chemosensitivity, the patients with HER2 positive and triple-negative subtypes had worse disease-free survival(DFS)(P=0.001) and overall survival(OS)(P= 0.002) than those with Luminal subtypes in the whole population, and especially worse in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with decreased DFS(P<0.001) and OS(P<0.001). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients who achieved pathological complete response(p CR) were significantly higher than those of patients with residual disease after chemotherapy(P=0.002, P=0.012, respectively). Conclusion We have found that breast cancer patients with HER2 positive and triple-negative subtypes have higher sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and with higher rates of p CR but worse prognosis than those with Luminal subtypes.
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期782-788,共7页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
关键词 乳腺癌 分子分型 新辅助化疗 预后 Breast cancer Molecular subtypes Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Aleix Prat,Cristina Cruz,Katherine A. Hoadley,Orland Díez,Charles M. Perou,Judith Balma?a.Molecular features of the basal-like breast cancer subtype based on BRCA1 mutation status[J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment . 2014 (1)
  • 2Domenico Angelucci,Nicola Tinari,Antonino Grassadonia,Ettore Cianchetti,Giampiero Ausili-Cefaro,Laura Iezzi,Marinella Zilli,Simona Grossi,Lucia Anna Ursini,Maria Teresa Scognamiglio,Graziella Castrilli,Michele Tursi,Paolo Noccioli,Pasquale Cioffi,Stefano Iacobelli,Clara Natoli.Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for locally advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice[J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology . 2013 (2)
  • 3Jens Huober,Gunter Minckwitz,Carsten Denkert,Hans Tesch,Erich Weiss,Dirk Michael Zahm,Antje Belau,Fariba Khandan,Maik Hauschild,Christoph Thomssen,Bernhard H?gel,Silvia Darb-Esfahani,Keyur Mehta,Sibylle Loibl.Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study[J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment . 2010 (1)
  • 4M. E. Straver MD,E. J. Th. Rutgers MD, PhD,S. Rodenhuis MD, PhD,S. C. Linn MD, PhD,C. E. Loo MD,J. Wesseling MD, PhD,N. S. Russell MD, PhD,H. S. A. Oldenburg MD, PhD,N. Antonini Msc,M. T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters MD, PhD.The Relevance of Breast Cancer Subtypes in the Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology . 2010 (9)
  • 5RohitBhargava,SushilBeriwal,David J.Dabbs,UmutOzbek,AtillaSoran,Ronald R.Johnson,Adam M.Brufsky,Barry C.Lembersky,Gretchen M.Ahrendt.Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer . 2010 (6)
  • 6Rastogi Priya,Anderson Stewart J,Bear Harry D,Geyer Charles E,Kahlenberg Morton S,Robidoux André,Margolese Richard G,Hoehn James L,Vogel Victor G,Dakhil Shaker R,Tamkus Deimante,King Karen M,Pajon Eduardo R,Wright Mary Johanna,Robert Jean.Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology . 2008
  • 7Joel S. Parker,Michael Mullins,Maggie C.U. Cheang,Samuel Leung,David Voduc,Tammi Vickery,Sherri Davies,Christiane Fauron,Xiaping He,Zhiyuan Hu,John F. Quackenbush,Inge J. Stijleman,Juan Palazzo,J.S. Marron,Andrew B. Nobel,Ela.Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2009
  • 8Keith James,Elizabeth Eisenhauer,Michaele Christian,Monica Terenziani,Donald Vena,Alison Muldal,Patrick Theras.Measuring Response in Solid Tumors: Unidimensional Versus Bidimensional Measurement. Journal of the National Cancer Institute . 1999
  • 9Carey L A,Dees E C,Sawyer L,et al.The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clinical Cancer Research . 2007
  • 10Livasy CA,Karaca G,Nanda R,et al.Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Modern Pathology . 2006

共引文献2

同被引文献112

  • 1Fung KL, Pan J,Ohnuma S, et al. MDR1 synonymous polymor-phisms alter transporter specificity and protein stability in a stableepithelial monolayer [J].Cancer Res, 2014, 74(2) : 598-608. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2064.
  • 2Bray J, Sludden J, Griffin MJ,et al. Influence of pharmacogeneticson response and toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with doxo-rubicin and cyclophosphamide [J].Br J Cancer, 2010,102 (6):1003-1009. doi:10.1038/sj,bjc.6605587.
  • 3Zhou Z, Chen Q, Zuo D, et al. ABCB1 (rs 1128503) polymorphismand response to chemotherapy in patients with malignant tumors-ev-idences from a meta-analysis [J].Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8(1):265-272.
  • 4Perou CM,Sorlie T, Eisen MB,et al. Molecular portraits of humanbreast tumors[J].Nature,2000,406(6797) :747-752. doi: 10.1038/35021093.
  • 5Goldhirsch A,Wood WC,Coates AS,et al. Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gal-len International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of EarlyBreast Cancer 2011 [J].Ann Oncol,2011,22(8) : 1736-1747. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr304.
  • 6Carey LA,Dees EC,Sawyer L,et al. The triple negative paradox :primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes[J].ClinCancer Res, 2007, 13(8) :2329-2334. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1109.
  • 7Widodo I, Dwianingsih EK, Triningsih E, et al. Clinicopathologicalfeatures of indonesian breast cancers with different molecular sub-types[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2014,15 (15):6109-6113.
  • 8Ekhart C,Rodenhuis S,Smits PH,et al. An overview of the relationsbetween polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and drugtransporters and survival after cancer drug treatment[J].Cancer TreatRev,2009,35(1):18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.07.003.
  • 9Gud C, Pei QI,Tan H, et al. Effects of genetic factors on the pharma-cokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine in primary hyper-tensive patients[J].Biomed Rep,2015,3(2) : 195-200. doi: 10.3892/br.2014.395.
  • 10Cizmarikova M, Wagnerova M, Schonova L, et al. MDR1 (C3435T)polymorphism : relation to the risk of breast cancer and therapeuticoutcome[J].Pharmacogenomics J,2010,10( 1) :62-69. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.41.

引证文献12

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部