期刊文献+

论非法证据排除规则在民事诉讼中的适用——基于民事诉讼与刑事诉讼的比较 被引量:5

Illegal Obtained Evidence Applies to Civil Procedure——Accord to the Compare between Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国民事诉讼由职权主义向当事人主义的转变,人权保障、程序正义的理念逐步深入人心。非法证据排除规则成为人权保障和程序正义的应有之意。但是由于调整的社会关系不同,民事诉讼与刑事诉讼在诉讼理念、诉讼结构等方面存在很大差异。因此,非法证据排除规则在两大诉讼法中具有了不同的内涵。 The idea of guarantee of human rights and procedural justice is slowly filtering into people’s minds while civil procedure has changed from the inquisitorial system to adversary system. Exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence has become connotation of guarantee of human rights and procedural justice. However, civil procedure and criminal procedure are different in procedural idea and procedural structure, because they adjust to different social relation. Therefore, Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence has different meanings in civil procedural law and criminal procedural law.
作者 赵静
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》 2007年第5期146-149,共4页 Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词 非法证据排除 民事诉讼 刑事诉讼 Illegally Obtained Evidence Civil Procedure Criminal Procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1黄松有主编,最高人民法院民事审判第一庭.民事诉讼证据司法解释的理解与适用[M]中国法制出版社,2002.
  • 2(意)莫诺·卡佩莱蒂(MauroCappelletti)等著,徐昕.当事人基本程序保障权与未来的民事诉讼[M]法律出版社,2000.

共引文献20

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部