摘要
法律判决的形成可被视为法制度内评价的可普遍化。根据这种阐释,在法律判决的形成过程中,判决者应当首先形成关于案件事实的陈述。在疑难案件中,确定案件事实、形成案件事实的陈述需要通过逻辑推演来实现。经过逻辑推演的方式形成案件事实及案件事实的陈述后,根据可普遍化的规则,司法者对案件做出法律判决。据此,可以把这种法律判决的形成模式概括为"先推论后可普遍化"形式。
The formation of legal judgment can be regarded as"the universalization of evaluation in the legal system". According to this interpretation, in the process of forming legal judgment, the judge should first create a statement of the case facts. In difficult cases, confirming the case facts and forming the statement are achieved by using the legal reasoning. Then, the judge of the case makes the legal judgment through abiding by the rule of the universalization. Accordingly, the model of the formation of legal judgment can be summed up as"first reasoning and then universalized".
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2008年第4期107-112,共6页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
法制度内评价
可普遍化
案件事实的陈述
逻辑推演
Evaluation in the Legal System
Universalization
Statement of the Case Facts
Logical Reasoning