期刊文献+

行政赔偿原则新论——以行政不作为归责之漏洞为视角 被引量:1

New View on the Principle of Administrative Reparation——the Perspective of Administrative Omission’ loophole
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行政行为包含作为和不作为之双重形态,中国行政赔偿制度确立的违法责任原则以作为的违法为归责核心,漠视了对不作为违法的责任追究,导致不作为形态的归责游离于赔偿制度之外。由于行政不作为的违法属性难以认定,其赔偿范围以及赔偿标准都存在较大争议,建议架构以违法责任原则为排除性原则、实际损害原则为请求性原则、过错责任原则为补充性原则的原则体系,统领行政行为的双重责任制度。 Administrative act contains double forms of accomplishment and omission. In China, the principle of administrative reparation is on breaking the law which is established the core of administrative accomplishment.It has not been treated administrative omission ,leading the result of omission dissociating from system of administrative reparation.Compared with accomplishment,omission is very difficult judged in breaking the law or not , in paying for range and standard . So,In China,we suggest that the principle of breaking the law as excluded principle, of actual damage as requested principle and of fault as complemented principle should be brought into the system of administrative reparation simultaneously.
作者 高卫明
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》 2009年第4期122-127,共6页 Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词 行政赔偿 归责原则 行政行为 行政不作为 Administrative Reparation Principle of Imputation Administrative Act Administrative Omission
  • 相关文献

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部