“穆勒评注”研究的几个问题

The Problems of Research on “Notes on J.Mill"

国内理论界近年来围绕"穆勒评注"的讨论激烈而广泛。从文献学研究、内在逻辑、文本学解读等方面进行了详细的解读,争论的焦点主要是"穆勒评注"与《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的写作顺序;"穆勒评注"的基本范畴及意义的文本学解读;"穆勒评注"与"第一手稿"中内容的高下;"穆勒评注"在马克思思想史上的地位。不过,这些争论也并没有使问题得以完全澄清。尤其显示出文本文献学研究力度的不够,对"穆勒评注"的研究尚需继续深入。

In recent years,"Notes on J.Mill" has been intensely and widely discussed in domestic theoretical circles.Research on "Notes on J.Mill" includes detailed interpretation in philology research,inherent logic,textology and so on.The debates focus on the writing order between "1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscript" and "Notes on J.Mill",textological interpretation on the basic category and meaning of "Notes on J.Mill",difference between "Notes on J.Mill" and "First-hand Draft";the position of "Notes on J.Mill" in the history of Marx’s thought.However,the debate has not made the problems completely clear.Especially,there is not enough research on text philology,further study on "Notes on J.Mill" need to be continued.