“代笔行为”法律探析——以“方韩论战”为切入点

The Legal Analysis of Ghostwriting——Taking the“Debate between Fang and Han”as Entry Point

"韩寒代笔门"在网络上引起了轩然大波,并逐渐演变为一场"网民、知识分子、媒体人参与的规模巨大的论战",人们除了对韩寒是否被代笔这一事实感兴趣外,也展开了对"代笔行为"中存在的法律问题的激烈探讨。"代笔行为"从当前《著作权法》看其并无明显违法之处,从商标权法角度分析也有一定合理之处,但却严重侵犯了消费者的合法权益,因此对其不能简单地肯定或否定,而要深刻分析其存在原因和运作模式,并从著作权法、商标权法、学术规范和消费者权益保护法角度探讨"代笔行为"的利弊,以对其进行合理的规制和引导。

"Han Han ghostwriting event "has caused a great disturbance in the network,and gradually evolves into a huge controversy involved netizen,intellectuals and media people.Whether Han Han has ever employed ghostwriters or not,which has launched a fierce discussion on legal problems of ghost behavior.According to the current Copyright Law,ghost behavior has no obvious illegal aspects,at the same time it is reasonable from the Trademark Law.But it has caused a serious violation of the legitimate interests of consumers.We need to make a profound analysis of its causes and mode of operation,and via the Copyright law,Trademark law,academic standard and Law of Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests to identify the advantages and disadvantages,and then to carry on the reasonable regulation and guide.