期刊文献+

在科学与民主之间有效地规制风险——评伊丽莎白·费雪的《风险规制与行政宪政主义》

Regulate Risk Effectively between Science and Democracy——Review of Fisher’s“Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 费雪的《风险规制与行政宪政主义》分析了传统风险规制的科学路径与民主路径并阐释了两种路径所存在的弊端,她指出问题的症结乃是忽略了技术风险规制中公共行政的基础,贬低并忽视法律,为此她创造性地提出行政宪政主义的全新研究视角。当下风险规制决策模式也存在着科学与民主二分法的踪影,以费雪教授的行政宪政主义为视角,摒弃传统科学与民主二分法、解决技术风险规制合法性以及充分发挥专业性组织的作用是应对问题之策。 Fisher’s Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism analyzes the traditional risk regulation scientific path and democratic path and illustrates the two paths’ drawbacks,she pointes out the crux which ignores technical risk regulation in the foundation of public administration,belittle and disregard for the law,for which she creatively puts forward a new administrative constitutionalism research perspective. Today’s risk regulation decision model also exists trace dichotomy of science and democracy,based on Professor Fisher’s administrative perspective of constitutionalism,abandonning the traditional dichotomy of science and democracy,resolving technical risk regulation legitimacy and giving full play to the role of professional organizations,all these form the policy dealing with the problem.
作者 葛伟
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》 2013年第3期152-155,160,共5页 Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词 风险规制 理性-工具 商谈-建构 行政宪政主义 Risk Regulation Ration – instrument Discussion – construction Administrative Constitutionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1(美)托马斯·库恩(ThomasS.Kuhn)著,金吾伦,胡新和.科学革命的结构[M]北京大学出版社,2003.
  • 2Sheila Jasanoff.Law′s Knowledge:Science for Justice in Legal Settings[].AmJPubHealth.2005
  • 3National Research Council,Committee on the Institutional Means for the Assessment in the Federal Government.Risk Assessment in the Federal Government:Managing the Process. Journal of Women s Health . 1983
  • 4J Mashaw.law and engineering: In Serch of the Law-Science Problem[].Law and Contemporary Problems.2003
  • 5Jasanoff,S. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers . 1990
  • 6Nelken D.Using the Concept of Legal Culture[].Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy.2004

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部