聚众淫乱罪之刑法干涉正当性分析

Analysis on the Justification of the Interference from Criminal Law in the Assembled Pruriency Crime

公众对聚众淫乱罪存在之合理性的争论由来已久,但历来探讨的焦点往往都集中于自由与秩序间之平衡、道德与法律间之界限此等"顽疾"。或许,从刑法干涉的正当性角度思考该问题,会有异样的收获。而对于刑法干涉正当性的判断,宜以功利主义为原则;在无他人被害的场合,例外地适用家长主义。以此为模式,通过对聚众淫乱罪的刑法干涉之正当性分析,可以得出以下两点结论:第一,公然的聚众淫乱行为侵害了他人对性的情感,刑法应予以规制;第二,对于秘密的聚众淫乱行为,刑法不具有干涉的正当性。对比上述两点结论,我国现行规定确有完善之必要。

Argument on the rationality of the crime of assembled pruriency has been for a long time,but the former arguments focus on these"chronic illness"such as the balance between freedom and order,the boundary between moral and legal.Perhaps,from the perspective of the justification of the interference from criminal law,there will be unexpected harvest.In general,the principle of utilitarianism is more suitable to apply in the identification of the justification of the interference from criminal law,on the occasion of no others were infringed,the principle of paternalism should apply to exceptionally.As for this model,analyzing the identification of the justification of the interference from criminal law in the crime of assembled pruriency,we can draw the following two conclusions: Firstly,the undisguised assembled pruriency infringes on the sentiment to sex of others,needing the interference from criminal law.Secondly,for the disguised assembled pruriency,criminal law hasn’t the justification of the interference.Contrasting these two conclusions,the exiting regulations on this in our country are necessary to improve.