摘要
《合同法》第52条第5项将判决违法合同效力的法律依据的位阶限定在"法律"和"行政法规"。这种做法无论是在逻辑上还是在事实上都是不合理的,不利于维护社会公共利益。而目前实务界和学界就此问题所提出的解释方案也存在着局限性,使得52条内部条文体系产生混乱和冲突,也不利于维护法律的安定性。从解释论的角度,应当抛弃以"损害国家利益"作为外衣,以引入"论理性法源"的做法;应当将该条第4项"损害社会公共利益"界定为仅仅只"危害国家公序"。
The article 52 nd of the "Contract Law"limits the hierarchy of the laws which could be used to judging the validity of the illegal contract to the "law"and "administrative regulations". This approach is unreasonable neither for logic nor for reality —— not conducive to the benefits of the society. However,the method of the solution the current practice and academic circles on the issue has some limitations,which makes chaos and conflict in the 52 internal provision system —— harmful to the stability of law. From the theory point of view,we should abandon the "damage the interests of the state"as the cloak,to let the "on rational law"in; the meaning of the fourth shall be defined as the "endangering national public order". From the perspective of the codification of civil law,in the fifth of the 52 nd of "Contract Law",the word "administrative regulations"could be deleted.
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2015年第2期136-141,共6页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
法律位阶
私法自治
公法管制
Legal Hierarchy
Autonomy of Private Law
Control of Law
