刑法解释论:质疑、曲解与理性解读

Theory of Criminal Law Interpretation——Questioning,Twist and Rational Interpretation

形式解释论与实质解释论之争存在诸多问题,如立足体系不明,相互之间存在大量的曲解,因此需要进行理性解读。在坚持罪刑法定原则的基础下,就值得科处刑罚但无条文规定的行为可以作不利于行为人的扩大解释,即坚持实质解释论;有条文规定但不值得科处刑罚的行为,形式解释论与实质解释论因均存在误解,认为该行为不构成犯罪,但这种情形应严格保障法律的安定性,认定犯罪成立。

The dispute between the form and the essence of criminal law interpretation exists many problems,for example the base system is unknown; there are a lot of twists between them. Therefore they need to be rational interoperated. According to Nulla poena sine lege,its explanation can be expanded when the behavior is worth punishing but there is no stipulation,namely adhering to the substantial interpretation theory; on the other hand,the stipulation considers that a behavior is a crime but it is not necessary. Both form and essence theory of explanation fall into misunderstandings,considering that behavior does not constitute a crime,but this kind of situation should strictly guard the legal stability,thus the crime is established.